Phase Alignment, Orthogonality Forcing, and the Absence of Blow-Up in a Vector Shell Model of Turbulence

The paper presents a mathematical and numerical investigation of how Fourier-phase alignment affects finite-time singularity formation in turbulent shell models. As stated in the abstract, “in the scalar GOY model, perfect phase alignment forces the enstrophy to blow up in finite time while energy remains bounded,” whereas in the vector L’vov model “the enstrophy stays uniformly bounded, and no finite-time singularity is observed.” Three forcing protocols—no forcing, global phase alignment, and orthogonality forcing—are tested. All preserve energy exactly, and none produce blow-up. The geometric explanation is that the triple cross-product structure suppresses coherent forward energy transfer, suggesting that the Navier–Stokes equations may be protected by intrinsic geometric frustration.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21111296
Primary Topic
Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Phase Alignment, Orthogonality Forcing, and the Absence of Blow-Up in a Vector Shell Model of Turbulence

Luca Eliseo Pavesi
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
preprint

Phase Alignment, Orthogonality Forcing, and the Absence of Blow-Up in a Vector Shell Model of Turbulence

Luca Eliseo Pavesi
preprint en

Abstract

The paper presents a mathematical and numerical investigation of how Fourier-phase alignment affects finite-time singularity formation in turbulent shell models. As stated in the abstract, “in the scalar GOY model, perfect phase alignment forces the enstrophy to blow up in finite time while energy remains bounded,” whereas in the vector L’vov model “the enstrophy stays uniformly bounded, and no finite-time singularity is observed.” Three forcing protocols—no forcing, global phase alignment, and orthogonality forcing—are tested. All preserve energy exactly, and none produce blow-up. The geometric explanation is that the triple cross-product structure suppresses coherent forward energy transfer, suggesting that the Navier–Stokes equations may be protected by intrinsic geometric frustration.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Affordable and clean energy
Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.