Is simulation always a safe learning environment? Anxiety and social anxiety symptoms in first-year medical students during simulated patient encounters

BACKGROUND: Interpersonal contact is essential for health professions. Simulation with actors in a safe, protected environment followed by feedback from teachers and simulated patients can positively impact anxiety symptoms related to social anxiety, which this project focuses on. OBJECTIVES: To assess social anxiety in medical students and their relationship with practical simulations during the first year, determining the prevalence of social anxiety; and to qualitatively analyze students' narratives about simulations with simulated patients. METHODS: Self-administered questionnaires measured social anxiety (LSAS - Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale) and trait anxiety weeks before the experience, and monthly on simulation days, assessing LSAS and state anxiety. Free narratives on expectations (before) and experiences (on simulation day) were collected. RESULTS: The mean baseline LSAS was 56.66 ± 26.71; mean trait anxiety was 49.03 ± 12.05. Expectations showed high motivation and recognition of the learning potential and personal development through simulations, but also anxiety, nervousness, self-doubt, and insecurity. On simulation days, 80 students gave 107 responses; mean LSAS was 51.95 ± 28.49, not significantly different from baseline (p=0.30). Mean state anxiety was 48.93 ± 10.75. Among 21 students with repeated responses, no significant change was found in state anxiety (p=0.66) or LSAS (p=0.09) over time. Qualitative analysis highlighted anxiety and performance insecurity, but also ambivalence, with reports of fear alongside pleasure and gratitude. Students saw simulations as opportunities for self-reflection and growth in a safe space to learn from mistakes. CONCLUSION: High anxiety linked to simulations is a concern and should be addressed in simulation planning to ensure a psychologically safe learning environment. Social anxiety may hinder clinical performance and should be addressed in health professions education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09827-y
Primary Topic
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is simulation always a safe learning environment? Anxiety and social anxiety symptoms in first-year medical students during simulated patient encounters

Iolanda de Fátima Lopes Calvo Tibério, Maria Helena Sampaio Favarato, Isabela Chagas Peres
BMC Medical Education
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
article

Is simulation always a safe learning environment? Anxiety and social anxiety symptoms in first-year medical students during simulated patient encounters

Iolanda de Fátima Lopes Calvo Tibério, Maria Helena Sampaio Favarato, Isabela Chagas Peres
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interpersonal contact is essential for health professions. Simulation with actors in a safe, protected environment followed by feedback from teachers and simulated patients can positively impact anxiety symptoms related to social anxiety, which this project focuses on. OBJECTIVES: To assess social anxiety in medical students and their relationship with practical simulations during the first year, determining the prevalence of social anxiety; and to qualitatively analyze students' narratives about simulations with simulated patients. METHODS: Self-administered questionnaires measured social anxiety (LSAS - Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale) and trait anxiety weeks before the experience, and monthly on simulation days, assessing LSAS and state anxiety. Free narratives on expectations (before) and experiences (on simulation day) were collected. RESULTS: The mean baseline LSAS was 56.66 ± 26.71; mean trait anxiety was 49.03 ± 12.05. Expectations showed high motivation and recognition of the learning potential and personal development through simulations, but also anxiety, nervousness, self-doubt, and insecurity. On simulation days, 80 students gave 107 responses; mean LSAS was 51.95 ± 28.49, not significantly different from baseline (p=0.30). Mean state anxiety was 48.93 ± 10.75. Among 21 students with repeated responses, no significant change was found in state anxiety (p=0.66) or LSAS (p=0.09) over time. Qualitative analysis highlighted anxiety and performance insecurity, but also ambivalence, with reports of fear alongside pleasure and gratitude. Students saw simulations as opportunities for self-reflection and growth in a safe space to learn from mistakes. CONCLUSION: High anxiety linked to simulations is a concern and should be addressed in simulation planning to ensure a psychologically safe learning environment. Social anxiety may hinder clinical performance and should be addressed in health professions education.

BMC Medical Education
Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul (BR), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.