The Social Contract and Collective Action: Grievances, Cleavages, and Protests in the Middle East

ABSTRACT How do grievances turn into collective action? This article examines how citizens' expectations in social contracts lead them to embark on street protests. It draws on original, nationally representative telephone surveys in Tunisia and Lebanon and unpacks popular preferences about the states' obligations to deliver social service provision, protection, and political participation. We measure empirically whether participation in protest can be explained predominantly by people's grievances with their states' social contract obligations or the position of people in society. Findings reveal intriguing differences between the two countries but also among social groups within societies. We find that socially privileged people are more likely to take to the streets in pursuit of their demands, lending support to theories that identify society's middle classes as drivers of protest action. We believe that the article's findings will have significant implications for studies of contentious state‐society relations in the MENA region and beyond.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kyklos
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.70067
Primary Topic
Middle East Politics and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Social Contract and Collective Action: Grievances, Cleavages, and Protests in the Middle East

Markus Loewe, Holger Albrecht
Kyklos
Middle East Politics and Society
article

The Social Contract and Collective Action: Grievances, Cleavages, and Protests in the Middle East

Markus Loewe, Holger Albrecht
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT How do grievances turn into collective action? This article examines how citizens' expectations in social contracts lead them to embark on street protests. It draws on original, nationally representative telephone surveys in Tunisia and Lebanon and unpacks popular preferences about the states' obligations to deliver social service provision, protection, and political participation. We measure empirically whether participation in protest can be explained predominantly by people's grievances with their states' social contract obligations or the position of people in society. Findings reveal intriguing differences between the two countries but also among social groups within societies. We find that socially privileged people are more likely to take to the streets in pursuit of their demands, lending support to theories that identify society's middle classes as drivers of protest action. We believe that the article's findings will have significant implications for studies of contentious state‐society relations in the MENA region and beyond.

Kyklos
German Institute of Development and Sustainability (DE), Hochschule Bonn-Rhein-Sieg (DE), University of Alabama (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Middle East Politics and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.