Capital theory and liberty – why they belong together

Abstract Historically, issues surrounding capital and interest have been tied to conflicts over exploitation, domination and the choice between capitalism and socialism. By contrast, modern growth and financial theory define capital as a homogeneous factor in a production function or as a portfolio of financial claims, thereby bracketing both the system question and the long‑standing critique of capital income. The paper argues that a serious theory of capital must not be detached from the theory of economic systems and, by implication, from the configuration of liberties and unfreedoms that different institutional arrangements entail. Drawing on the practice‑based capital concepts of Menger and Mises, the paper sets out a notion of capital as a money‑denominated aggregate of business assets and liabilities used in monetary calculation, and shows how this concept is inseparable from an institutional framework characterized by private property, entrepreneurship, money and markets for loans and producer goods. In doing so, it proposes a way of reconnecting capital theory to the analysis of economic systems and liberty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Review of Austrian Economics
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-026-00750-5
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Institutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Capital theory and liberty – why they belong together

Eduard Braun
The Review of Austrian Economics
Economic Theory and Institutions
article

Capital theory and liberty – why they belong together

Eduard Braun
article en

Abstract

Abstract Historically, issues surrounding capital and interest have been tied to conflicts over exploitation, domination and the choice between capitalism and socialism. By contrast, modern growth and financial theory define capital as a homogeneous factor in a production function or as a portfolio of financial claims, thereby bracketing both the system question and the long‑standing critique of capital income. The paper argues that a serious theory of capital must not be detached from the theory of economic systems and, by implication, from the configuration of liberties and unfreedoms that different institutional arrangements entail. Drawing on the practice‑based capital concepts of Menger and Mises, the paper sets out a notion of capital as a money‑denominated aggregate of business assets and liabilities used in monetary calculation, and shows how this concept is inseparable from an institutional framework characterized by private property, entrepreneurship, money and markets for loans and producer goods. In doing so, it proposes a way of reconnecting capital theory to the analysis of economic systems and liberty.

The Review of Austrian Economics
Seeburg Castle University (AT), Clausthal University of Technology (DE)
Technische Universität Clausthal
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Economic Theory and Institutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.