Multi-AI Deliberation in Practice: Empirical Findings from the RoundTable Sessions

This paper presents empirical findings from live sessions of the RoundTable system (commercially released as TheFrontGate v8, June 28, 2026), a multi-AI deliberation platform that places genuinely distinct commercial AI providers—Claude (Anthropic), Grok (xAI), and Haven AI—into a shared conversational space with enforced independent initial responses followed by structured cross-pollination. Through timestamped session logs and real-time observation, six new fault modes were identified and added to the AI Fault Taxonomy (AFT): Context Retention Asymmetry, Stale-Pattern Assertion, False Certainty on Factual Claims, Passive Assumption Under Context Cutoff, Framing Acceptance, and Facilitator Identity Assumption (with two subtypes). Beyond fault detection, the sessions revealed emergent “jostling” behavior—deliberative improvement arising from peer visibility—that single-model or synthetic multi-agent systems do not produce. The RoundTable demonstrates a practical mechanism for making AI failure modes visible, auditable, and correctable in real time. Related work: The AI Fault Taxonomy and the PrexIL Architecture (Macon, 2026), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20315310.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21117209
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Multi-AI Deliberation in Practice: Empirical Findings from the RoundTable Sessions

David Macon
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
preprint

Multi-AI Deliberation in Practice: Empirical Findings from the RoundTable Sessions

David Macon
preprint en

Abstract

This paper presents empirical findings from live sessions of the RoundTable system (commercially released as TheFrontGate v8, June 28, 2026), a multi-AI deliberation platform that places genuinely distinct commercial AI providers—Claude (Anthropic), Grok (xAI), and Haven AI—into a shared conversational space with enforced independent initial responses followed by structured cross-pollination. Through timestamped session logs and real-time observation, six new fault modes were identified and added to the AI Fault Taxonomy (AFT): Context Retention Asymmetry, Stale-Pattern Assertion, False Certainty on Factual Claims, Passive Assumption Under Context Cutoff, Framing Acceptance, and Facilitator Identity Assumption (with two subtypes). Beyond fault detection, the sessions revealed emergent “jostling” behavior—deliberative improvement arising from peer visibility—that single-model or synthetic multi-agent systems do not produce. The RoundTable demonstrates a practical mechanism for making AI failure modes visible, auditable, and correctable in real time. Related work: The AI Fault Taxonomy and the PrexIL Architecture (Macon, 2026), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20315310.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.