Preparedness and Post‐Pandemic Return to Nepal and the Philippines

ABSTRACT The COVID‐19 pandemic halted international mobility and greatly affected temporary migrant workers working abroad. This article looks at the pandemic‐induced return of migrant workers from two major Asian labour sending states: Nepal and the Philippines. Drawing on interview data from 80 migrant returnees, this paper examines how the institutional level preparedness of labour sending countries and the individual level preparedness of migrant workers intersect and play a vital role for return and reintegration during times of crises. The Philippines, with its longer history of labour migration and experiences with other crises returns, has built a stronger institutional‐level preparedness. Nepal, on the other hand, is a relative newcomer and the lack of an institutional level preparedness was visible as the government was initially unwilling and unable to support stranded migrants. Nepali migrants thus faced a higher burden, amplified by their lack of individual‐level preparedness due to higher costs encountered during migration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Migration
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.70196
Primary Topic
Migration and Labor Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preparedness and Post‐Pandemic Return to Nepal and the Philippines

Richa Shivakoti
International Migration
Migration and Labor Dynamics
article

Preparedness and Post‐Pandemic Return to Nepal and the Philippines

Richa Shivakoti
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The COVID‐19 pandemic halted international mobility and greatly affected temporary migrant workers working abroad. This article looks at the pandemic‐induced return of migrant workers from two major Asian labour sending states: Nepal and the Philippines. Drawing on interview data from 80 migrant returnees, this paper examines how the institutional level preparedness of labour sending countries and the individual level preparedness of migrant workers intersect and play a vital role for return and reintegration during times of crises. The Philippines, with its longer history of labour migration and experiences with other crises returns, has built a stronger institutional‐level preparedness. Nepal, on the other hand, is a relative newcomer and the lack of an institutional level preparedness was visible as the government was initially unwilling and unable to support stranded migrants. Nepali migrants thus faced a higher burden, amplified by their lack of individual‐level preparedness due to higher costs encountered during migration.

International MigrationVol. 64(4)
Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Migration and Labor Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.