Vertical accuracy of ASTER, SRTM, and NASADEM digital surface models across Malawi’s diverse topography

Digital Surface Models (DSMs) are widely used as important sources of topographic information for earth science and environmental applications. The accuracy of DSMs has direct impacts on several environmental calculations and processes. Therefore, it is imperative to select the most suitable DSM based on the aim and accuracy requirements of each application. However, the use of an appropriate DSM has always been a challenge. This study evaluated the vertical accuracy and performance of the freely available Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), NASA DEM (NASADEM), and Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER). The DSM elevations were measured against high-precision national geodetic control points. Among other accuracy metrics, we computed Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and examined the influence of elevation, slope, aspect, curvature, and land cover. At the national scale, SRTM (RMSE of 19.55 m) and NASADEM (RMSE of 19.99 m) showed comparable performance, while ASTER produced a higher RMSE of 22.13 m. However, the principal finding was that DSM accuracy varied substantially across Malawi's diverse terrain. All the DSMs performed particularly well in the low-lying Lower Shire Valley, with RMSEs of 3.25 m (NASADEM), 4.30 m (SRTM), and 6.91 m (ASTER). Errors increased markedly in the Highlands, where RMSE reached 35.03 m for NASADEM, 33.62 m for SRTM, and 36.94 m for ASTER. In addition, accuracy decreased with increasing elevation and slope, particularly in highland regions and on slopes steeper than 30°. Aspect showed the highest relative importance in the Random Forest analysis. However, the differences in accuracy among aspect classes were comparatively modest, and greater underestimation was observed on north- and west-facing slopes. These findings demonstrate that national-scale accuracy statistics alone do not adequately describe DSM suitability across Malawi's diverse landscapes. DSM selection should therefore consider the terrain and land-cover characteristics of the intended application area.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361397
Primary Topic
Satellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vertical accuracy of ASTER, SRTM, and NASADEM digital surface models across Malawi’s diverse topography

Godwell Nhamo, Brighton Austin Chunga, Kennedy Nazombe, Charles Bakolo et al.
PLoS ONE
Satellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry
article

Vertical accuracy of ASTER, SRTM, and NASADEM digital surface models across Malawi’s diverse topography

Godwell Nhamo, Brighton Austin Chunga, Kennedy Nazombe, Charles Bakolo, Rodrick Mlewa
article en

Abstract

Digital Surface Models (DSMs) are widely used as important sources of topographic information for earth science and environmental applications. The accuracy of DSMs has direct impacts on several environmental calculations and processes. Therefore, it is imperative to select the most suitable DSM based on the aim and accuracy requirements of each application. However, the use of an appropriate DSM has always been a challenge. This study evaluated the vertical accuracy and performance of the freely available Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), NASA DEM (NASADEM), and Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER). The DSM elevations were measured against high-precision national geodetic control points. Among other accuracy metrics, we computed Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and examined the influence of elevation, slope, aspect, curvature, and land cover. At the national scale, SRTM (RMSE of 19.55 m) and NASADEM (RMSE of 19.99 m) showed comparable performance, while ASTER produced a higher RMSE of 22.13 m. However, the principal finding was that DSM accuracy varied substantially across Malawi's diverse terrain. All the DSMs performed particularly well in the low-lying Lower Shire Valley, with RMSEs of 3.25 m (NASADEM), 4.30 m (SRTM), and 6.91 m (ASTER). Errors increased markedly in the Highlands, where RMSE reached 35.03 m for NASADEM, 33.62 m for SRTM, and 36.94 m for ASTER. In addition, accuracy decreased with increasing elevation and slope, particularly in highland regions and on slopes steeper than 30°. Aspect showed the highest relative importance in the Random Forest analysis. However, the differences in accuracy among aspect classes were comparatively modest, and greater underestimation was observed on north- and west-facing slopes. These findings demonstrate that national-scale accuracy statistics alone do not adequately describe DSM suitability across Malawi's diverse landscapes. DSM selection should therefore consider the terrain and land-cover characteristics of the intended application area.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(10)
University of South Africa (ZA), Mzuzu University (MW), Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (MW), Stockholm Environment Institute (KE), Ministry of Lands, Housing & Urban Development (UG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Satellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon