Believing What We Want? Myside Bias and the Role of Open Science Practices in Public Trust in Science

Public trust in science may depend not only on the quality of the research but also on laypersons’ attitudes towards the underlying topic. Although Open Science practices are meant to signal credibility, their influence on laypersons remains unclear, especially for scientifically controversial topics. In this preregistered Austrian study (N=1,083), general trust in science and myside bias strongly predicted trust in certain popular-scientific summaries, while explicit Open Science cues did not show an effect. Exploratory analyses showed that participants’ optimistic conceptions of science were also linked to higher trust. Overall, biased beliefs appear more influential than transparency-related cues for trust in science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Communication
Published
2026-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470261475540
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Believing What We Want? Myside Bias and the Role of Open Science Practices in Public Trust in Science

Sarah von Götz, Fabian Gehm, Hilmar Brohmer
Science Communication
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

Believing What We Want? Myside Bias and the Role of Open Science Practices in Public Trust in Science

Sarah von Götz, Fabian Gehm, Hilmar Brohmer
article en

Abstract

Public trust in science may depend not only on the quality of the research but also on laypersons’ attitudes towards the underlying topic. Although Open Science practices are meant to signal credibility, their influence on laypersons remains unclear, especially for scientifically controversial topics. In this preregistered Austrian study (N=1,083), general trust in science and myside bias strongly predicted trust in certain popular-scientific summaries, while explicit Open Science cues did not show an effect. Exploratory analyses showed that participants’ optimistic conceptions of science were also linked to higher trust. Overall, biased beliefs appear more influential than transparency-related cues for trust in science.

Science Communication
University of Graz (AT), Vorarlberg University of Applied Sciences (AT)
Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.