Improvement of Quantitative Reasoning Skills in Transfer and Direct Entry Students Exposed to Cell Biology Modules

Calls for transforming biological curricula have emphasized a need for improving quantitative skill development in STEM education. To address this, we designed six interdisciplinary modules to develop quantitative reasoning competencies for a sophomore-level Cell Biology course. After a comprehensive curriculum alignment procedure between a four-year institution and its primary community college sending institutions, we determined module topics, then developed and implemented the modules. We assessed the effects of the modules on student proficiencies using validated pre-post measurements of specific quantitative competencies. Students showed significant total growth in quantitative goals for all modules and for each module individually, even though modules varied widely in difficulty. Transfer students were equally able as direct entry students to gain in quantitative proficiency across the modules, which is an improvement over the findings of a previous study. Additionally, both transfer and direct entry students exposed to more modules had a higher score on a global assessment of quantitative and biological concepts. Attitude assessments showed that students had an overall positive experience with the modules. Our results suggest that adding quantitative modules to core biology courses can promote student understanding of quantitative concepts for both direct entry and transfer students and can benefit transfer students in particular.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16071035
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improvement of Quantitative Reasoning Skills in Transfer and Direct Entry Students Exposed to Cell Biology Modules

Michelle Starz‐Gaiano, William R. LaCourse, Jeff Leips, Christopher R. Rakes et al.
Education Sciences
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Improvement of Quantitative Reasoning Skills in Transfer and Direct Entry Students Exposed to Cell Biology Modules

Michelle Starz‐Gaiano, William R. LaCourse, Jeff Leips, Christopher R. Rakes, Sarah Leupen, Kathleen Hoffman, Patricia Turner, Hannah Pie, Tory Williams
article en

Abstract

Calls for transforming biological curricula have emphasized a need for improving quantitative skill development in STEM education. To address this, we designed six interdisciplinary modules to develop quantitative reasoning competencies for a sophomore-level Cell Biology course. After a comprehensive curriculum alignment procedure between a four-year institution and its primary community college sending institutions, we determined module topics, then developed and implemented the modules. We assessed the effects of the modules on student proficiencies using validated pre-post measurements of specific quantitative competencies. Students showed significant total growth in quantitative goals for all modules and for each module individually, even though modules varied widely in difficulty. Transfer students were equally able as direct entry students to gain in quantitative proficiency across the modules, which is an improvement over the findings of a previous study. Additionally, both transfer and direct entry students exposed to more modules had a higher score on a global assessment of quantitative and biological concepts. Attitude assessments showed that students had an overall positive experience with the modules. Our results suggest that adding quantitative modules to core biology courses can promote student understanding of quantitative concepts for both direct entry and transfer students and can benefit transfer students in particular.

Education SciencesVol. 16(7)
University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US), Howard Community College (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.