The timing trap: Misinformation, disinformation, and the limits of fact-checking in Kenya’s 2022 elections

This article advances the concept of the 'timing trap' to explain why fact-checking struggles to interrupt mis/disinformation during elections, even in well-resourced verification environments. The trap arises from three interacting dynamics: the speed of false information flows, the epistemic demands of professional verification, and the political conditions shaping how corrections are received. Using Kenya's 2022 election as a least-likely case and drawing on practitioner interviews and analysis of approximately 150 fact-checks, the article identifies three mechanisms through which the trap manifested: procedural and infrastructural delays, legitimacy contests and asymmetric trust, and an archival orientation positioning fact-checking as a long-term resource. The trap's severity varies with disinformation coordination, political polarisation and institutional distrust, and can be partially mitigated through anticipatory communication, cross-sectoral coalitions and verification literacy. These findings reframe fact-checking's contribution to digital peacebuilding: its value lies in building informational infrastructure – archives, norms and literacy – that strengthens democratic deliberation over time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
South African Journal of International Affairs
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2026.2683199
Primary Topic
Political Conflict and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The timing trap: Misinformation, disinformation, and the limits of fact-checking in Kenya’s 2022 elections

Michael K. Asiedu
South African Journal of International Affairs
Political Conflict and Governance
article

The timing trap: Misinformation, disinformation, and the limits of fact-checking in Kenya’s 2022 elections

Michael K. Asiedu
article en

Abstract

This article advances the concept of the 'timing trap' to explain why fact-checking struggles to interrupt mis/disinformation during elections, even in well-resourced verification environments. The trap arises from three interacting dynamics: the speed of false information flows, the epistemic demands of professional verification, and the political conditions shaping how corrections are received. Using Kenya's 2022 election as a least-likely case and drawing on practitioner interviews and analysis of approximately 150 fact-checks, the article identifies three mechanisms through which the trap manifested: procedural and infrastructural delays, legitimacy contests and asymmetric trust, and an archival orientation positioning fact-checking as a long-term resource. The trap's severity varies with disinformation coordination, political polarisation and institutional distrust, and can be partially mitigated through anticipatory communication, cross-sectoral coalitions and verification literacy. These findings reframe fact-checking's contribution to digital peacebuilding: its value lies in building informational infrastructure – archives, norms and literacy – that strengthens democratic deliberation over time.

South African Journal of International Affairs
University of St.Gallen (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Political Conflict and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.