Negative Digestibility: A Theoretical Perspective

Digestibility is a fundamental concept in animal nutrition and is widely used to evaluate feed ingredients. Although digestibility values are generally expected to be positive, negative values are occasionally reported. Negative values are not analytical or calculation errors; rather, they often convey critical information about feed ingredients. Negative digestibility is most commonly observed for minerals, which readily interact with other components in compound feeds and within the gut lumen. A proper understanding of negative digestibility is therefore essential for formulating nutritionally complete diets. This paper introduces Mellanby’s toxamin theory to illustrate the mechanisms underlying negative digestibility. It also explains the rationale behind digestibility calculations, which sometimes yield mathematically extreme and biologically unrealistic negative values. Finally, the paper proposes in vivo mineral-binding capacity as an alternative metric for expressing ingredient interactions, as negative digestibility values themselves can lead to confusion and misinterpretation. By reinterpreting the biological significance of negative digestibility, this paper seeks to translate an often-confusing observation into a more practical and informative nutritional index.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aquaculture Journal
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/aquacj6030024
Primary Topic
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Negative Digestibility: A Theoretical Perspective

Shozo H. Sugiura
Aquaculture Journal
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
article

Negative Digestibility: A Theoretical Perspective

Shozo H. Sugiura
article en

Abstract

Digestibility is a fundamental concept in animal nutrition and is widely used to evaluate feed ingredients. Although digestibility values are generally expected to be positive, negative values are occasionally reported. Negative values are not analytical or calculation errors; rather, they often convey critical information about feed ingredients. Negative digestibility is most commonly observed for minerals, which readily interact with other components in compound feeds and within the gut lumen. A proper understanding of negative digestibility is therefore essential for formulating nutritionally complete diets. This paper introduces Mellanby’s toxamin theory to illustrate the mechanisms underlying negative digestibility. It also explains the rationale behind digestibility calculations, which sometimes yield mathematically extreme and biologically unrealistic negative values. Finally, the paper proposes in vivo mineral-binding capacity as an alternative metric for expressing ingredient interactions, as negative digestibility values themselves can lead to confusion and misinterpretation. By reinterpreting the biological significance of negative digestibility, this paper seeks to translate an often-confusing observation into a more practical and informative nutritional index.

Aquaculture JournalVol. 6(3)
University of Shiga Prefecture (JP)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.