Prophylactic azithromycin for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Introduction According to the WHO, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the fourth leading cause of mortality worldwide due to acute exacerbations (AECOPD). Prophylactic azithromycin has been suggested as a preventive therapy; therefore, this study aims to find the optimal dose for the best clinical outcomes.Theory Azithromycin exerts antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory effects that may reduce AECOPD risk.Methods We systematically searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Randomised controlled trials comparing prophylactic azithromycin with placebo/standard care were included according to the provided PICO framework. The outcomes were defined based on the GOLD Guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using ROB 2 and certainty of evidence using GRADE.Results Six trials (n = 1,673) were included. Azithromycin significantly reduced AECOPD (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.48–0.74; p < 0.00001). The analyses showed that 250 mg and 500 mg thrice-weekly for 3 months were superior to once-daily. Hospitalisations (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.35–0.95; p = 0.03) and serious adverse events (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61–0.97; p = 0.03) were reduced. At 250 mg once-daily, there was a significant risk of resistance, compared to 250/500 mg thrice-weekly (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.06–0.78, p = 0.02). The heterogeneity varied depending on the assessed outcome (I2 = 0% to 60%); accordingly, subgroup analyses were performed. The overall ROB2 summary showed low to moderate risk in most domains. GRADE showed high certainty of evidence in reducing AECOPD events.Discussion Compared with prior studies, these findings reinforce the therapeutic potential of intermittent dosing strategies for preventing AECOPD while maintaining an acceptable safety profile. Further trials are needed to define optimal duration and long-term outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Public Health
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2026.2692158
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prophylactic azithromycin for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Salah Abdalrazak Alshehade, Ahmad Naoras Bitar, Mohammed Zawiah, Fahmi Y. Al-Ashwal et al.
Critical Public Health
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
article

Prophylactic azithromycin for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Salah Abdalrazak Alshehade, Ahmad Naoras Bitar, Mohammed Zawiah, Fahmi Y. Al-Ashwal, Mohammed Ahmed Al-kaif, Mohamad Dayoob, Wong Bee Suen, Xuan Ling Oh
article en

Abstract

Introduction According to the WHO, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the fourth leading cause of mortality worldwide due to acute exacerbations (AECOPD). Prophylactic azithromycin has been suggested as a preventive therapy; therefore, this study aims to find the optimal dose for the best clinical outcomes.Theory Azithromycin exerts antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory effects that may reduce AECOPD risk.Methods We systematically searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Randomised controlled trials comparing prophylactic azithromycin with placebo/standard care were included according to the provided PICO framework. The outcomes were defined based on the GOLD Guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using ROB 2 and certainty of evidence using GRADE.Results Six trials (n = 1,673) were included. Azithromycin significantly reduced AECOPD (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.48–0.74; p < 0.00001). The analyses showed that 250 mg and 500 mg thrice-weekly for 3 months were superior to once-daily. Hospitalisations (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.35–0.95; p = 0.03) and serious adverse events (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61–0.97; p = 0.03) were reduced. At 250 mg once-daily, there was a significant risk of resistance, compared to 250/500 mg thrice-weekly (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.06–0.78, p = 0.02). The heterogeneity varied depending on the assessed outcome (I2 = 0% to 60%); accordingly, subgroup analyses were performed. The overall ROB2 summary showed low to moderate risk in most domains. GRADE showed high certainty of evidence in reducing AECOPD events.Discussion Compared with prior studies, these findings reinforce the therapeutic potential of intermittent dosing strategies for preventing AECOPD while maintaining an acceptable safety profile. Further trials are needed to define optimal duration and long-term outcomes.

Critical Public HealthVol. 36(1)
Northern Border University (SA), American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (US), Hai phong University Of Medicine and Pharmacy (VN), Iraqi University (IQ), Mahsa University (MY), Zhongshan Hospital (CN), Sultan Zainal Abidin University (MY), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.