Productivity models for cut-to-length harvesters and harwarders: a systematic review over the period 2013–2023

Precise predictions of work productivity are crucial for planning and costing of forest operations. Productivity models are developed based on time studies or follow-up studies, and due to the diverse work conditions and the choices of the modeler, model characteristics—such as independent variables and predictive capabilities—may differ considerably. Despite their significance, relatively few studies have critically examined productivity models for fully mechanized harvesting systems. Therefore, a literature review was conducted to identify and scrutinize productivity models for cut-to-length harvesters and harwarders. Eighty-two publications containing models were identified for the period 2013–2023. The publications originated from five continents and 19 countries, and covered a wide range of forest types and work conditions. In the publications, 311 models were identified, and several commonalities as well as differences between models and publications were identified. For example, the majority of publications used piece size (tree volume or diameter at breast height) as a predictor, but there was a large variation in which additional predictors were used. Furthermore, the type of mathematical function and predictive capabilities of models varied considerably. This review offers insights that may contribute to the harmonization of the development and application of productivity models. It also provides an extensive compilation of models, which facilitates easier identification and accessibility to them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Forest Engineering
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2026.2687233
Primary Topic
Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Productivity models for cut-to-length harvesters and harwarders: a systematic review over the period 2013–2023

Ola Lindroos, William Arnvik
International Journal of Forest Engineering
Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
article

Productivity models for cut-to-length harvesters and harwarders: a systematic review over the period 2013–2023

Ola Lindroos, William Arnvik
article en

Abstract

Precise predictions of work productivity are crucial for planning and costing of forest operations. Productivity models are developed based on time studies or follow-up studies, and due to the diverse work conditions and the choices of the modeler, model characteristics—such as independent variables and predictive capabilities—may differ considerably. Despite their significance, relatively few studies have critically examined productivity models for fully mechanized harvesting systems. Therefore, a literature review was conducted to identify and scrutinize productivity models for cut-to-length harvesters and harwarders. Eighty-two publications containing models were identified for the period 2013–2023. The publications originated from five continents and 19 countries, and covered a wide range of forest types and work conditions. In the publications, 311 models were identified, and several commonalities as well as differences between models and publications were identified. For example, the majority of publications used piece size (tree volume or diameter at breast height) as a predictor, but there was a large variation in which additional predictors were used. Furthermore, the type of mathematical function and predictive capabilities of models varied considerably. This review offers insights that may contribute to the harmonization of the development and application of productivity models. It also provides an extensive compilation of models, which facilitates easier identification and accessibility to them.

International Journal of Forest Engineering
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.