Does AI empower or exhaust? Indonesian students' acceptance of AI in scientific writing shaped by cultural norms

Purpose This study examines Indonesian EFL students' acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in scientific writing through the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), with a focus on how cultural norms shape their perceptions and use of AI. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative phenomenological approach was employed. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with eight undergraduate students engaged in thesis writing and analyzed thematically to capture their lived experiences with AI. Findings Students perceive AI as useful and easy to use for improving writing efficiency, clarity and revision. However, acceptance is conditional and shaped by sociocultural factors, including respect for lecturer authority, academic integrity and moral responsibility. These factors create ongoing tension between the benefits of AI and the need to maintain ethical and academic standards. Originality/value This study extends TAM by demonstrating that AI acceptance in scientific writing is not purely technological but socioculturally mediated, where students negotiate technological affordances with ethical expectations and academic norms in the Indonesian context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-01-2026-0065
Primary Topic
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does AI empower or exhaust? Indonesian students' acceptance of AI in scientific writing shaped by cultural norms

Ahmad Ridho Rojabi, Rengganis Siwi Amumpuni, Yuli Astutik, M Khusna Amal et al.
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
article

Does AI empower or exhaust? Indonesian students' acceptance of AI in scientific writing shaped by cultural norms

Ahmad Ridho Rojabi, Rengganis Siwi Amumpuni, Yuli Astutik, M Khusna Amal, Andi Mustofa
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study examines Indonesian EFL students' acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in scientific writing through the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), with a focus on how cultural norms shape their perceptions and use of AI. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative phenomenological approach was employed. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with eight undergraduate students engaged in thesis writing and analyzed thematically to capture their lived experiences with AI. Findings Students perceive AI as useful and easy to use for improving writing efficiency, clarity and revision. However, acceptance is conditional and shaped by sociocultural factors, including respect for lecturer authority, academic integrity and moral responsibility. These factors create ongoing tension between the benefits of AI and the need to maintain ethical and academic standards. Originality/value This study extends TAM by demonstrating that AI acceptance in scientific writing is not purely technological but socioculturally mediated, where students negotiate technological affordances with ethical expectations and academic norms in the Indonesian context.

Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education
Yogyakarta State University (ID), Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo (ID), Universitas Islam Jember (ID), Universitas PGRI Madiun (ID)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.