Post-cessation Weight Regain After Weight Management Medications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Approved weight management medications achieve clinically meaningful weight loss, yet post-cessation weight regain is the central barrier to sustained benefit. No prior synthesis has pooled regain estimates exclusively from longitudinal studies published since January 2020, the period in which incretin-based pharmacotherapy became the standard of care. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 2020 to May 2026. Eligible designs included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a withdrawal phase, prospective cohort studies, and retrospective database analyses. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane RoB 2 for RCTs and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for observational studies. A DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model was applied in R 4.3.3 (metafor 4.4.0). The primary outcome was mean percentage body weight regain from end-of-treatment to follow-up. Seventeen studies met all eligibility criteria: three RCTs, three prospective cohort studies, and 11 retrospective database analyses (N = 3,793 participants in cessation arms). Fifteen of 17 studies (88.2%) were rated high quality. Pooled mean weight regain was 7.20% (95% CI: 5.93-8.48; I² = 97.6%; Q[df = 16] = 676.74; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis by drug class yielded: semaglutide 2.4 mg, 7.19% (k = 6; 95% CI: 6.42-7.96); liraglutide 3.0 mg, 4.83% (k = 4; 95% CI: 3.87-5.79); and tirzepatide, 13.04% (k = 3; 95% CI: 11.87-14.21). In three comparative RCTs, cessation arms gained a mean 14.26 percentage points more than continuation arms (95% CI: 8.86-19.65). Egger's test was not statistically significant (z = 1.91, p = 0.056), consistent with no systematic reporting bias. Stopping approved weight management medications consistently produces clinically significant weight regain across drug classes, study designs, and geographic regions. The magnitude of regain tracks initial efficacy and supports a long-term pharmacotherapy model analogous to chronic disease management. Future trials should pre-specify post-cessation follow-up as a mandatory outcome.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.111786
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Post-cessation Weight Regain After Weight Management Medications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simon Christie, Shimul A Babli, Henna Patel, Newton Rahming et al.
Cureus
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

Post-cessation Weight Regain After Weight Management Medications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simon Christie, Shimul A Babli, Henna Patel, Newton Rahming, Shivani Shah, Shlok H Khambholja, UFN Rizwanullah, Curie Villarson, Asher Masood, Trimbakesh D Lingadahalli, Lauren L Wallace, Sures Kumarsivarajah, Opeyemi S Alamu
article en

Abstract

Approved weight management medications achieve clinically meaningful weight loss, yet post-cessation weight regain is the central barrier to sustained benefit. No prior synthesis has pooled regain estimates exclusively from longitudinal studies published since January 2020, the period in which incretin-based pharmacotherapy became the standard of care. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 2020 to May 2026. Eligible designs included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a withdrawal phase, prospective cohort studies, and retrospective database analyses. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane RoB 2 for RCTs and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for observational studies. A DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model was applied in R 4.3.3 (metafor 4.4.0). The primary outcome was mean percentage body weight regain from end-of-treatment to follow-up. Seventeen studies met all eligibility criteria: three RCTs, three prospective cohort studies, and 11 retrospective database analyses (N = 3,793 participants in cessation arms). Fifteen of 17 studies (88.2%) were rated high quality. Pooled mean weight regain was 7.20% (95% CI: 5.93-8.48; I² = 97.6%; Q[df = 16] = 676.74; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis by drug class yielded: semaglutide 2.4 mg, 7.19% (k = 6; 95% CI: 6.42-7.96); liraglutide 3.0 mg, 4.83% (k = 4; 95% CI: 3.87-5.79); and tirzepatide, 13.04% (k = 3; 95% CI: 11.87-14.21). In three comparative RCTs, cessation arms gained a mean 14.26 percentage points more than continuation arms (95% CI: 8.86-19.65). Egger's test was not statistically significant (z = 1.91, p = 0.056), consistent with no systematic reporting bias. Stopping approved weight management medications consistently produces clinically significant weight regain across drug classes, study designs, and geographic regions. The magnitude of regain tracks initial efficacy and supports a long-term pharmacotherapy model analogous to chronic disease management. Future trials should pre-specify post-cessation follow-up as a mandatory outcome.

Cureus
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.