Shared decision-making in pediatric physical therapy: A qualitative study among adolescents, parents, and physical therapists

OBJECTIVE: Shared Decision Making (SDM) is a collaborative process between patients and clinicians. A structured approach for SDM in pediatric physical therapy is lacking. This two-phase study aimed to 1) explore how and when to apply SDM in pediatric physical therapy in primary healthcare, and to identify barriers and facilitators influencing its use, and 2) adapt an SDM model for use in pediatric physical therapy and propose strategies for implementation. METHODS: The study consisted of two phases. In Phase 1, six focus groups were conducted, two per participant group: adolescents (12-18y, n = 11), parents of children (4-18y, n = 9), and pediatric physical therapists (n = 6). A qualitative survey among 46 pediatric physical therapists validated focus group results. An inductive analysis explored how and when SDM should be applied, and a deductive analysis identified barriers and facilitators by linking codes to Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) domains. In Phase 2, the research team integrated results into an existing goal-based SDM-model, and implementation strategies were selected using the CFIR-Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change tool. RESULTS: SDM can begin at intake and goal setting, with ongoing, individualized involvement of children and parents throughout therapy. When comparing therapy options, treatment frequency, duration, homework, expectations, and possibilities at home can be discussed. Barriers included time constraints and the challenge of balancing multiple perspectives, while facilitators were the possibility to adapt SDM conversations per family and a supportive practice culture. A goal-based SDM-model was adapted for pediatric physical therapy. Implementation strategies identified were professional training, use of SDM tools, sufficient contact with parents, time to learn SDM, a supportive team culture, and empowering parents and children. DISCUSSION: This study provides guidelines for implementing SDM in pediatric physical therapy in primary care. A multifaceted implementation approach, guided by this study's implementation strategies, may enhance SDM integration into clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0352677
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shared decision-making in pediatric physical therapy: A qualitative study among adolescents, parents, and physical therapists

Raoul Engelbert, Selina Limmen, Eugène Rameckers, Dirk T. Ubbink et al.
PLoS ONE
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

Shared decision-making in pediatric physical therapy: A qualitative study among adolescents, parents, and physical therapists

Raoul Engelbert, Selina Limmen, Eugène Rameckers, Dirk T. Ubbink, Dorinde Korteling, Hedy A. van Oers, Marij A. Hillen, Manon Bloemen, Marjolijn Ketelaar, Michiel A. J. Luijten, Lotte Haverman
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Shared Decision Making (SDM) is a collaborative process between patients and clinicians. A structured approach for SDM in pediatric physical therapy is lacking. This two-phase study aimed to 1) explore how and when to apply SDM in pediatric physical therapy in primary healthcare, and to identify barriers and facilitators influencing its use, and 2) adapt an SDM model for use in pediatric physical therapy and propose strategies for implementation. METHODS: The study consisted of two phases. In Phase 1, six focus groups were conducted, two per participant group: adolescents (12-18y, n = 11), parents of children (4-18y, n = 9), and pediatric physical therapists (n = 6). A qualitative survey among 46 pediatric physical therapists validated focus group results. An inductive analysis explored how and when SDM should be applied, and a deductive analysis identified barriers and facilitators by linking codes to Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) domains. In Phase 2, the research team integrated results into an existing goal-based SDM-model, and implementation strategies were selected using the CFIR-Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change tool. RESULTS: SDM can begin at intake and goal setting, with ongoing, individualized involvement of children and parents throughout therapy. When comparing therapy options, treatment frequency, duration, homework, expectations, and possibilities at home can be discussed. Barriers included time constraints and the challenge of balancing multiple perspectives, while facilitators were the possibility to adapt SDM conversations per family and a supportive practice culture. A goal-based SDM-model was adapted for pediatric physical therapy. Implementation strategies identified were professional training, use of SDM tools, sufficient contact with parents, time to learn SDM, a supportive team culture, and empowering parents and children. DISCUSSION: This study provides guidelines for implementing SDM in pediatric physical therapy in primary care. A multifaceted implementation approach, guided by this study's implementation strategies, may enhance SDM integration into clinical practice.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(6)
University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Maastricht University (NL), Emma Kinderziekenhuis (NL), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), Adelante (NL), GGD Amsterdam (NL), Public Health Service of Amsterdam (NL), Child Development Center (QA), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), De Hoogstraat Revalidatie (NL), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), Hasselt University (BE), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Zorginstituut Nederland
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.