Corporate social responsibility and consumer motivations: a means-end chain analysis

Purpose Researchers have mostly studied corporate social responsibility (CSR), from a business perspective, coping with CSR decisions as a corporate dilemma. This being the case, this study aims to focus on the emerging practice of CSR by exploring consumers’ perceptions of attributes, benefits and motivational values. Design/methodology/approach With a qualitative means-end chain (MEC) analysis, the authors explore participants’ CSR perceptions and purchase motivations through laddering interviews with 80 consumers from Western European countries. In contrast to traditional research in this area, which focuses separately on the moderating roles of a variety of brand specific attributes and initiatives, they adopt a holistic approach illustrating the pathways to CSR purchases. Findings The MEC analysis revealed five key values that captured the motivational patterns of participants: (1) personal social responsibility, (2) self-worth, (3) accomplishment, (4) social bonding and (5) safety. Originality/value This research provides an integrative understanding of CSR, bringing together drivers that so far have been examined in isolation. Hence, this research represents a more nuanced conceptualization of CSR and one of the first comprehensive attempts to simultaneously analyse multiple components. In addition to the extension of theories of CSR, the findings are equally valuable for practice as it informs CSR strategies that seek to maintain consumer support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Strategy
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jbs-08-2025-0201
Primary Topic
Cognitive and psychological constructs research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corporate social responsibility and consumer motivations: a means-end chain analysis

Julie Guidry Moulard, Lama Halwani, Abir Cherry
Journal of Business Strategy
Cognitive and psychological constructs research
article

Corporate social responsibility and consumer motivations: a means-end chain analysis

Julie Guidry Moulard, Lama Halwani, Abir Cherry
article en

Abstract

Purpose Researchers have mostly studied corporate social responsibility (CSR), from a business perspective, coping with CSR decisions as a corporate dilemma. This being the case, this study aims to focus on the emerging practice of CSR by exploring consumers’ perceptions of attributes, benefits and motivational values. Design/methodology/approach With a qualitative means-end chain (MEC) analysis, the authors explore participants’ CSR perceptions and purchase motivations through laddering interviews with 80 consumers from Western European countries. In contrast to traditional research in this area, which focuses separately on the moderating roles of a variety of brand specific attributes and initiatives, they adopt a holistic approach illustrating the pathways to CSR purchases. Findings The MEC analysis revealed five key values that captured the motivational patterns of participants: (1) personal social responsibility, (2) self-worth, (3) accomplishment, (4) social bonding and (5) safety. Originality/value This research provides an integrative understanding of CSR, bringing together drivers that so far have been examined in isolation. Hence, this research represents a more nuanced conceptualization of CSR and one of the first comprehensive attempts to simultaneously analyse multiple components. In addition to the extension of theories of CSR, the findings are equally valuable for practice as it informs CSR strategies that seek to maintain consumer support.

Journal of Business Strategy
Grenoble Ecole de Management (FR), Louisiana Tech University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cognitive and psychological constructs research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.