Corticomuscular Coherence in Post-Stroke Motor Function and Recovery

Background: Assessing cortical and muscle activity simultaneously during task performance may inform motor function post-stroke. This study evaluated brain–muscle functional connectivity (corticomuscular coherence, CMC) in early stroke recovery. Methods: Individuals with stroke in an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) completed motor assessments and simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) and electromyography (EMG) recordings during a grip task at IRF admission and discharge. Beta (20–30 Hz) CMC was measured between EEG electrodes overlying the primary motor cortex (M1) and supplementary motor area (SMA) and EMG leads overlying the first dorsal interosseous (FDI). Neurotypical controls completed identical EEG/EMG recordings. Correlational analyses were performed to ascertain CMC and motor assessment associations. CMC differences by Group (Stroke vs. Controls), Time (Admission vs. Discharge), and Extremity (Affected/Dominant vs. Less Affected/Non-Dominant) were estimated using mixed-effects linear models. Results: Thirty individuals with stroke (14 females, mean age 67.0 ± 9.8 years, 10.4 ± 3.5 days post-stroke) and 17 controls (8 females, mean age 75.3 ± 13 years) participated. Individuals with stroke exhibited reduced beta CMC between SMA and affected FDI (F(1,36.1) = 5.73, p = 0.02, Cohen’s f = 0.40) compared to controls, with lower CMC involving the affected vs. less affected extremity (F(1,73.0) = 5.72, p = 0.01, Cohen’s f = 0.28). Greater beta SMA–FDI CMC at admission related to poorer motor recovery (ρ = −0.59, p = 0.01). Group and Extremity CMC differences were not observed over time, nor were there changes in affected extremity CMC from admission to discharge. Conclusions: Beta SMA–FDI CMC is a marker of neural injury, exhibiting extremity-specific differences early post-stroke. While beta SMA–FDI CMC correlated with motor recovery, the absence of change over time during hospitalization necessitates longitudinal assessments to clarify its trajectory alongside recovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Sciences
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16070689
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corticomuscular Coherence in Post-Stroke Motor Function and Recovery

Jasper I. Mark, Jessica M. Cassidy, Rachana Gangwani, Sabrina Zadrozny
Brain Sciences
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Corticomuscular Coherence in Post-Stroke Motor Function and Recovery

Jasper I. Mark, Jessica M. Cassidy, Rachana Gangwani, Sabrina Zadrozny
article en

Abstract

Background: Assessing cortical and muscle activity simultaneously during task performance may inform motor function post-stroke. This study evaluated brain–muscle functional connectivity (corticomuscular coherence, CMC) in early stroke recovery. Methods: Individuals with stroke in an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) completed motor assessments and simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) and electromyography (EMG) recordings during a grip task at IRF admission and discharge. Beta (20–30 Hz) CMC was measured between EEG electrodes overlying the primary motor cortex (M1) and supplementary motor area (SMA) and EMG leads overlying the first dorsal interosseous (FDI). Neurotypical controls completed identical EEG/EMG recordings. Correlational analyses were performed to ascertain CMC and motor assessment associations. CMC differences by Group (Stroke vs. Controls), Time (Admission vs. Discharge), and Extremity (Affected/Dominant vs. Less Affected/Non-Dominant) were estimated using mixed-effects linear models. Results: Thirty individuals with stroke (14 females, mean age 67.0 ± 9.8 years, 10.4 ± 3.5 days post-stroke) and 17 controls (8 females, mean age 75.3 ± 13 years) participated. Individuals with stroke exhibited reduced beta CMC between SMA and affected FDI (F(1,36.1) = 5.73, p = 0.02, Cohen’s f = 0.40) compared to controls, with lower CMC involving the affected vs. less affected extremity (F(1,73.0) = 5.72, p = 0.01, Cohen’s f = 0.28). Greater beta SMA–FDI CMC at admission related to poorer motor recovery (ρ = −0.59, p = 0.01). Group and Extremity CMC differences were not observed over time, nor were there changes in affected extremity CMC from admission to discharge. Conclusions: Beta SMA–FDI CMC is a marker of neural injury, exhibiting extremity-specific differences early post-stroke. While beta SMA–FDI CMC correlated with motor recovery, the absence of change over time during hospitalization necessitates longitudinal assessments to clarify its trajectory alongside recovery.

Brain SciencesVol. 16(7)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Child Development Center (QA)
National Institutes of Health
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.