Judicial Review of the Activities of Public Authorities in the USA

The article is devoted to a comprehensive study of judicial review of the activities of public authorities in the USA. The work analyzes the theoretical foundations of the institution of judicial review, its historical evolution and modern institutional features of the American judicial review model. The article also analyzes contemporary precedents of judicial interference in the sphere of public authority, including decisions by US federal courts decisions, suspending or overturning presidential acts on immigration, emergency powers and tariff policy. These cases demonstrate the relevance and dynamism of judicial review in the context of political polarization. The methodological framework of the study comprises general scientific and formal legal (dogmatic) methods. It has been concluded that judicial review in the USA is not an auxiliary mechanism of legal protection, but a structural element of the democratic constitutional order that evolves in response to challenges of modern public authority.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Law Studies
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29039/2409-5087-2026-14-2-26-30
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Judicial Review of the Activities of Public Authorities in the USA

Ksenia Khrushcheva
Advances in Law Studies
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
article

Judicial Review of the Activities of Public Authorities in the USA

Ksenia Khrushcheva
article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to a comprehensive study of judicial review of the activities of public authorities in the USA. The work analyzes the theoretical foundations of the institution of judicial review, its historical evolution and modern institutional features of the American judicial review model. The article also analyzes contemporary precedents of judicial interference in the sphere of public authority, including decisions by US federal courts decisions, suspending or overturning presidential acts on immigration, emergency powers and tariff policy. These cases demonstrate the relevance and dynamism of judicial review in the context of political polarization. The methodological framework of the study comprises general scientific and formal legal (dogmatic) methods. It has been concluded that judicial review in the USA is not an auxiliary mechanism of legal protection, but a structural element of the democratic constitutional order that evolves in response to challenges of modern public authority.

Advances in Law StudiesVol. 14(2)
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (RU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Judicial Review of the Activities of Public Authorities in the USA — Ksenia Khrushcheva · Advances in Law Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS