The Embodiment Challenge for Artificial Intelligence

Abstract Recent advances in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) renewed the enthusiasm for what AIs can do. While some argue that AIs can be viable models for understanding human cognition, others go further and claim that future AIs might display cognitive capacities. However, although some current models excel at tasks such as language processing and pattern recognition, their operations fundamentally differ from human cognition. Unlike humans, who learn through embodied, intersubjective experiences tied to survival and adaptation, AIs typically cannot undergo structural changes due to their disembodied nature. To understand the significance of this difference, I turn to the radically embodied framework and raise the embodiment challenge for AI, namely: due to the lack of biological embodiment, situatedness, and autonomy, artificial systems cannot replicate the self-sustaining, survival-driven processes essential to naturally cognizing systems. I conclude that creating a genuinely cognitive artificial intelligence would require achieving artificial life first.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy & Technology
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-026-01139-9
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Embodiment Challenge for Artificial Intelligence

Giovanni Rolla
Philosophy & Technology
Embodied and Extended Cognition
article

The Embodiment Challenge for Artificial Intelligence

Giovanni Rolla
article en

Abstract

Abstract Recent advances in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) renewed the enthusiasm for what AIs can do. While some argue that AIs can be viable models for understanding human cognition, others go further and claim that future AIs might display cognitive capacities. However, although some current models excel at tasks such as language processing and pattern recognition, their operations fundamentally differ from human cognition. Unlike humans, who learn through embodied, intersubjective experiences tied to survival and adaptation, AIs typically cannot undergo structural changes due to their disembodied nature. To understand the significance of this difference, I turn to the radically embodied framework and raise the embodiment challenge for AI, namely: due to the lack of biological embodiment, situatedness, and autonomy, artificial systems cannot replicate the self-sustaining, survival-driven processes essential to naturally cognizing systems. I conclude that creating a genuinely cognitive artificial intelligence would require achieving artificial life first.

Philosophy & TechnologyVol. 39(3)
Universidade Federal da Bahia (BR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Embodied and Extended Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.