Aristotle’s Nondialectical Inquiry into Friendship in the Eudemian Ethics

abstract: The discussion of friendship in Eudemian Ethics VII is often taken as evidence that Aristotle relies on dialectic in this treatise. I argue that, although he uses some dialectical resources, these are insufficient for fully developing his account of friendship. His approach has four features: the arguments are philosophical, aiming at the nature and truth of friendship; he appeals to phainomena , including both endoxic and non-endoxic claims; resolving aporiai requires substantive philosophical knowledge; and, guided by epistemic optimism, he seeks to preserve what is true in existing beliefs. This contrasts with dialectical argument, which reasons from endoxic premises without aiming at endoxic conclusions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the history of philosophy
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2026.a994284
Primary Topic
Classical Philosophy and Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aristotle’s Nondialectical Inquiry into Friendship in the Eudemian Ethics

Nevim Borçin
Journal of the history of philosophy
Classical Philosophy and Thought
article

Aristotle’s Nondialectical Inquiry into Friendship in the Eudemian Ethics

Nevim Borçin
article en

Abstract

abstract: The discussion of friendship in Eudemian Ethics VII is often taken as evidence that Aristotle relies on dialectic in this treatise. I argue that, although he uses some dialectical resources, these are insufficient for fully developing his account of friendship. His approach has four features: the arguments are philosophical, aiming at the nature and truth of friendship; he appeals to phainomena , including both endoxic and non-endoxic claims; resolving aporiai requires substantive philosophical knowledge; and, guided by epistemic optimism, he seeks to preserve what is true in existing beliefs. This contrasts with dialectical argument, which reasons from endoxic premises without aiming at endoxic conclusions.

Journal of the history of philosophyVol. 64(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Classical Philosophy and Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.