Ventilator-derived <i>Versus</i> Standard Rapid Shallow Breathing Index for Weaning Assessment: A Systematic Review

<h3>Background/Aim:</h3> The rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) is widely used to assess readiness for liberation from mechanical ventilation. With advances in ventilator technology, RSBI is increasingly obtained directly from ventilator displays. However, differences in measurement conditions and ventilator settings may influence RSBI values and their clinical interpretation, particularly in relation to established cutoff thresholds. This systematic review aimed to evaluate differences between ventilator-derived and conventional RSBI measurements and their clinical implications. <h3>Materials and Methods:</h3> A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and Ovid for studies published up to February 24, 2026. Studies were included if they compared ventilator-derived RSBI with standard measurements in mechanically ventilated adult patients. Data on study design, measurement strategies, and outcomes were extracted and qualitatively synthesized. <h3>Results:</h3> A total of 11 prospective studies involving 824 patients were included. Most studies reported lower RSBI values under ventilatory support, particularly with pressure support ventilation (PSV) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), compared with measurements obtained during unsupported spontaneous breathing. However, some studies reported higher or variable RSBI values depending on ventilator algorithms and measurement techniques. Despite these differences, moderate to good correlations were observed between ventilator-derived and conventional RSBI measurements. Additional factors, including trigger sensitivity and base flow, were found to influence RSBI values, whereas changes in FiO<sub>2</sub> had minimal impact. <h3>Conclusion:</h3> Ventilator-derived RSBI provides a practical alternative for assessing weaning readiness, but values may differ from conventional measurements depending on ventilatory support and measurement conditions. The traditional cutoff of 105 breaths/min/l remains appropriate for unsupported breathing, whereas lower thresholds may be required when RSBI is obtained from ventilators. Careful interpretation is necessary, and further studies are needed to establish standardized measurement approaches and optimal cutoff values.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
In Vivo
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.14342
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ventilator-derived Versus Standard Rapid Shallow Breathing Index for Weaning Assessment: A Systematic Review

Szu-Chi Pai, TAO-AN CHEN, YA-TING CHUANG, JIA-YIH FENG et al.
In Vivo
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Ventilator-derived Versus Standard Rapid Shallow Breathing Index for Weaning Assessment: A Systematic Review

Szu-Chi Pai, TAO-AN CHEN, YA-TING CHUANG, JIA-YIH FENG, CHANG-SHENG LIN, YANN-YU LAY
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background/Aim:</h3> The rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) is widely used to assess readiness for liberation from mechanical ventilation. With advances in ventilator technology, RSBI is increasingly obtained directly from ventilator displays. However, differences in measurement conditions and ventilator settings may influence RSBI values and their clinical interpretation, particularly in relation to established cutoff thresholds. This systematic review aimed to evaluate differences between ventilator-derived and conventional RSBI measurements and their clinical implications. <h3>Materials and Methods:</h3> A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and Ovid for studies published up to February 24, 2026. Studies were included if they compared ventilator-derived RSBI with standard measurements in mechanically ventilated adult patients. Data on study design, measurement strategies, and outcomes were extracted and qualitatively synthesized. <h3>Results:</h3> A total of 11 prospective studies involving 824 patients were included. Most studies reported lower RSBI values under ventilatory support, particularly with pressure support ventilation (PSV) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), compared with measurements obtained during unsupported spontaneous breathing. However, some studies reported higher or variable RSBI values depending on ventilator algorithms and measurement techniques. Despite these differences, moderate to good correlations were observed between ventilator-derived and conventional RSBI measurements. Additional factors, including trigger sensitivity and base flow, were found to influence RSBI values, whereas changes in FiO<sub>2</sub> had minimal impact. <h3>Conclusion:</h3> Ventilator-derived RSBI provides a practical alternative for assessing weaning readiness, but values may differ from conventional measurements depending on ventilatory support and measurement conditions. The traditional cutoff of 105 breaths/min/l remains appropriate for unsupported breathing, whereas lower thresholds may be required when RSBI is obtained from ventilators. Careful interpretation is necessary, and further studies are needed to establish standardized measurement approaches and optimal cutoff values.

In VivoVol. 40(4)
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW), Taipei Veterans General Hospital (TW), Chang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.