Comparison of Protein Coronas and Internalized Cell Surface Proteins of Positive and Negative Liposomes

Positive nanoparticles have often a higher uptake than neutral and negative nanoparticles. This is usually attributed to electrostatic interactions with negatively charged proteoglycans on the cell membrane. However, upon contact with serum, nanoparticles adsorb a biomolecule corona and tend toward neutrality, suggesting that electrostatic interactions alone cannot explain the different uptake. Here, we used oppositely charged liposomes as an example to explore at a fundamental level why positive nanoparticles usually show a higher uptake than the negative ones. Two proteomic-based approaches were combined to compare their protein coronas and the cell surface proteins involved in their internalization. The results showed that the higher uptake of the positive liposomes used for this study could not be simply explained by the involvement of specific corona proteins and dominating cell surface proteins. Instead, small differences in the abundances of a large number of corona proteins and cell surface proteins were observed, including multiple low-abundance proteins. Importantly, the positive liposomes had higher uptake than the negative liposomes only when added to cells in the presence of serum, suggesting that the higher uptake likely resulted from the observed subtle differences in their corona and the collective contribution and interactions with multiple cell surface proteins.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Nano
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6c00799
Primary Topic
Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Protein Coronas and Internalized Cell Surface Proteins of Positive and Negative Liposomes

Roberta Bartucci, Feng Zhao, Xinyu Ma, Anna Salvati et al.
ACS Nano
Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
article

Comparison of Protein Coronas and Internalized Cell Surface Proteins of Positive and Negative Liposomes

Roberta Bartucci, Feng Zhao, Xinyu Ma, Anna Salvati, Cassandra Kirby-Smith, Justina C. Wolters
article en

Abstract

Positive nanoparticles have often a higher uptake than neutral and negative nanoparticles. This is usually attributed to electrostatic interactions with negatively charged proteoglycans on the cell membrane. However, upon contact with serum, nanoparticles adsorb a biomolecule corona and tend toward neutrality, suggesting that electrostatic interactions alone cannot explain the different uptake. Here, we used oppositely charged liposomes as an example to explore at a fundamental level why positive nanoparticles usually show a higher uptake than the negative ones. Two proteomic-based approaches were combined to compare their protein coronas and the cell surface proteins involved in their internalization. The results showed that the higher uptake of the positive liposomes used for this study could not be simply explained by the involvement of specific corona proteins and dominating cell surface proteins. Instead, small differences in the abundances of a large number of corona proteins and cell surface proteins were observed, including multiple low-abundance proteins. Importantly, the positive liposomes had higher uptake than the negative liposomes only when added to cells in the presence of serum, suggesting that the higher uptake likely resulted from the observed subtle differences in their corona and the collective contribution and interactions with multiple cell surface proteins.

ACS Nano
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), University of Groningen (NL)
China Scholarship Council
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.