Aberration correction in fetal ultrasound: Clinical evaluation on image quality improvement

OBJECTIVE: Obstetric ultrasound is key for assessing fetal growth and detecting anomalies, with image quality critical for diagnostic accuracy. Maternal body mass index (BMI) and other factors can impair quality. Aberration correction (AC) aims to reduce image quality degradation. This prospective observational study assessed the effect of AC on fetal ultrasound image quality and biometric measurements. METHODS: Routine ultrasound images of the fetal head, abdomen, and heart were analyzed. The image quality score (IQS) and biometric measurements, including the circumference of the head, abdomen, and heart, were compared before and after AC. Intraclass correlations (ICC) were used to describe intra- and inter-observer agreement of measurements. Secondary objective evaluated IQS subcomponents and outcomes stratified by BMI. RESULTS: The study included 186 images from 62 patients. IQS were significantly higher in AC-images (median 14) compared with no-AC images (median 13.5), with significance observed across both BMI groups and a more pronounced effect in the normal BMI group. Intra- and inter-observer agreement for cardiac circumference improved after AC (0.907 to 0.987 and 0.873 to 0.925). For other measurements, agreement was excellent (>0.9) regardless of AC or BMI. CONCLUSION: Aberration correction improved obstetric ultrasound by enhancing image quality and increasing the reliability of biometric measurements, particularly of smaller fetal structures. The results highlight the clinical potential of AC and lay the foundation for future research to assess its role in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.71125
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aberration correction in fetal ultrasound: Clinical evaluation on image quality improvement

Loes Monen, Cybèle Ciofolo, Laurence Rouet, Judith van Laar et al.
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Aberration correction in fetal ultrasound: Clinical evaluation on image quality improvement

Loes Monen, Cybèle Ciofolo, Laurence Rouet, Judith van Laar, Sophie Dassen, Jeanne Dieleman, Ruud van Sloun, Jean‐Luc Robert, Xufei Chen
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Obstetric ultrasound is key for assessing fetal growth and detecting anomalies, with image quality critical for diagnostic accuracy. Maternal body mass index (BMI) and other factors can impair quality. Aberration correction (AC) aims to reduce image quality degradation. This prospective observational study assessed the effect of AC on fetal ultrasound image quality and biometric measurements. METHODS: Routine ultrasound images of the fetal head, abdomen, and heart were analyzed. The image quality score (IQS) and biometric measurements, including the circumference of the head, abdomen, and heart, were compared before and after AC. Intraclass correlations (ICC) were used to describe intra- and inter-observer agreement of measurements. Secondary objective evaluated IQS subcomponents and outcomes stratified by BMI. RESULTS: The study included 186 images from 62 patients. IQS were significantly higher in AC-images (median 14) compared with no-AC images (median 13.5), with significance observed across both BMI groups and a more pronounced effect in the normal BMI group. Intra- and inter-observer agreement for cardiac circumference improved after AC (0.907 to 0.987 and 0.873 to 0.925). For other measurements, agreement was excellent (>0.9) regardless of AC or BMI. CONCLUSION: Aberration correction improved obstetric ultrasound by enhancing image quality and increasing the reliability of biometric measurements, particularly of smaller fetal structures. The results highlight the clinical potential of AC and lay the foundation for future research to assess its role in clinical practice.

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Máxima Medisch Centrum (NL), Philips (United States) (US), IPS Research (United States) (US), Philips (France) (FR), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.