Resisting artificial intelligence, automated-decision making, and algorithmic power: A systematic and narrative review
Despite increased use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and automated decision-making by governments and employers, an understanding of how users resist them is lacking. We conducted a systematic review of studies capturing algorithmic resistance published between 2000 and 2021, subjecting 7996 to a comprehensive screening process that yielded seven studies for analysis. These studies, focused on digital labor platforms and social media algorithms, showed three themes: how resistance is conceptualized, what forms it takes, and its outcomes. We found that studies of resistance are limited by disparate disciplinary contexts and conceptual redundancy, demanding interdisciplinary dialogue to avoid fragmentation.
Authors
- Kalervo Ν. Gulson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3581-9935)
- Bárbara Barbosa Neves (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4490-4322)
- Geoffrey Mead (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3908-8225)
- Kate Hutton Burns (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1229-8492)
Institutions
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU)
- Monash University (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Information Society
- Published
- 2026-06-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2026.2689687
- Primary Topic
- Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- University of Sydney
- Monash University