Resisting artificial intelligence, automated-decision making, and algorithmic power: A systematic and narrative review

Despite increased use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and automated decision-making by governments and employers, an understanding of how users resist them is lacking. We conducted a systematic review of studies capturing algorithmic resistance published between 2000 and 2021, subjecting 7996 to a comprehensive screening process that yielded seven studies for analysis. These studies, focused on digital labor platforms and social media algorithms, showed three themes: how resistance is conceptualized, what forms it takes, and its outcomes. We found that studies of resistance are limited by disparate disciplinary contexts and conceptual redundancy, demanding interdisciplinary dialogue to avoid fragmentation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Information Society
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2026.2689687
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resisting artificial intelligence, automated-decision making, and algorithmic power: A systematic and narrative review

Kalervo Ν. Gulson, Bárbara Barbosa Neves, Geoffrey Mead, Kate Hutton Burns
The Information Society
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Resisting artificial intelligence, automated-decision making, and algorithmic power: A systematic and narrative review

Kalervo Ν. Gulson, Bárbara Barbosa Neves, Geoffrey Mead, Kate Hutton Burns
article en

Abstract

Despite increased use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and automated decision-making by governments and employers, an understanding of how users resist them is lacking. We conducted a systematic review of studies capturing algorithmic resistance published between 2000 and 2021, subjecting 7996 to a comprehensive screening process that yielded seven studies for analysis. These studies, focused on digital labor platforms and social media algorithms, showed three themes: how resistance is conceptualized, what forms it takes, and its outcomes. We found that studies of resistance are limited by disparate disciplinary contexts and conceptual redundancy, demanding interdisciplinary dialogue to avoid fragmentation.

The Information Society
The University of Sydney (AU), Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), Monash University (AU)
University of Sydney, Monash University
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.