Ending participatory research projects: Entangled temporalities, endy moments and afterlives

Bringing Participatory Research projects to an end poses particular challenges, with scholars often articulating affects of guilt and disappointment at unfinished endings. A mismatch between institutionally defined deadlines, and the relational and political ongoingness of participatory research create contradictory demands. Drawing on three anchor cases, we offer three concepts to support conceptualising and planning for project endings. First, understanding the multiple ‘entangled temporalities’ of participatory research projects, with different time horizons and rhythms, in relations of power and associated affects, helps us analyse the complexity of endings. Second, while formal end-points often clash with participatory temporalities, marking ‘endy moments’ can offer satisfying provisional closures. Third, ideas and networks fostered by a project may reverberate beyond its formal end, through generative, often unpredicted ‘afterlives’. We argue that approaching endings through a lens of multiple temporalities supports co-design of more mutually productive endings, and end by suggesting strategies for rebalancing temporal power.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Research
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941261458717
Primary Topic
Participatory Visual Research Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ending participatory research projects: Entangled temporalities, endy moments and afterlives

Flora Cornish, Hannah Cowan, Kate Summers, Sharmila Parmanand
Qualitative Research
Participatory Visual Research Methods
article

Ending participatory research projects: Entangled temporalities, endy moments and afterlives

Flora Cornish, Hannah Cowan, Kate Summers, Sharmila Parmanand
article en

Abstract

Bringing Participatory Research projects to an end poses particular challenges, with scholars often articulating affects of guilt and disappointment at unfinished endings. A mismatch between institutionally defined deadlines, and the relational and political ongoingness of participatory research create contradictory demands. Drawing on three anchor cases, we offer three concepts to support conceptualising and planning for project endings. First, understanding the multiple ‘entangled temporalities’ of participatory research projects, with different time horizons and rhythms, in relations of power and associated affects, helps us analyse the complexity of endings. Second, while formal end-points often clash with participatory temporalities, marking ‘endy moments’ can offer satisfying provisional closures. Third, ideas and networks fostered by a project may reverberate beyond its formal end, through generative, often unpredicted ‘afterlives’. We argue that approaching endings through a lens of multiple temporalities supports co-design of more mutually productive endings, and end by suggesting strategies for rebalancing temporal power.

Qualitative Research
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
British Academy
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Participatory Visual Research Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.