Evaluating the utility of AI-generated mammography images in breast cancer analysis

Generative AI models are increasingly used to address data scarcity and class imbalance in biomedical image analysis, yet their practical value depends on downstream clinical task improvements rather than visual fidelity alone. To gain insight into their downstream utility, we conduct a systematic evaluation of class-conditional AI-generated images and their impact when integrated into a breast cancer classification pipeline. We develop a classifier-free guided denoising diffusion probabilistic model (DDPM) to generate benign and malignant full-image mammograms under varying inference configurations. Model training is based on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammograms from the Emory Breast Imaging Dataset. DDPM guidance scales for inference are chosen based on image fidelity and class separability, as evaluated by Fréchet Inception Distance and a pre-trained Oracle classifier, respectively. We also introduce a two-phase training strategy, where models get pretrained on real data augmented with AI-generated data followed by fine-tuning on real data only. Quantitative performance evaluation for guidance strength, AI-generated-to-real data proportion, and training strategy impact, is based on Balanced Accuracy, Sensitivity, and Specificity. Our findings indicate lack of consistent performance gains for AI-generated images used to mitigate data scarcity. Any gains are sensitive to guidance scale, liable to degrade when AI-generated data replaces real beyond a proportion. However, our two-phase training strategy yields consistent improvements, when compared with real-data-only baseline and fixed guidance scales. This suggests that AI-generated data cannot replace real clinical data, but can serve as a useful transfer learning signal when carefully integrated into the training pipelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-58260-0
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the utility of AI-generated mammography images in breast cancer analysis

Dimitrios Makris, Akis Linardos, Aimilia Gastounioti, Spyridon Bakas et al.
Scientific Reports
AI in cancer detection
article

Evaluating the utility of AI-generated mammography images in breast cancer analysis

Dimitrios Makris, Akis Linardos, Aimilia Gastounioti, Spyridon Bakas, Siddhesh Thakur
article en

Abstract

Generative AI models are increasingly used to address data scarcity and class imbalance in biomedical image analysis, yet their practical value depends on downstream clinical task improvements rather than visual fidelity alone. To gain insight into their downstream utility, we conduct a systematic evaluation of class-conditional AI-generated images and their impact when integrated into a breast cancer classification pipeline. We develop a classifier-free guided denoising diffusion probabilistic model (DDPM) to generate benign and malignant full-image mammograms under varying inference configurations. Model training is based on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammograms from the Emory Breast Imaging Dataset. DDPM guidance scales for inference are chosen based on image fidelity and class separability, as evaluated by Fréchet Inception Distance and a pre-trained Oracle classifier, respectively. We also introduce a two-phase training strategy, where models get pretrained on real data augmented with AI-generated data followed by fine-tuning on real data only. Quantitative performance evaluation for guidance strength, AI-generated-to-real data proportion, and training strategy impact, is based on Balanced Accuracy, Sensitivity, and Specificity. Our findings indicate lack of consistent performance gains for AI-generated images used to mitigate data scarcity. Any gains are sensitive to guidance scale, liable to degrade when AI-generated data replaces real beyond a proportion. However, our two-phase training strategy yields consistent improvements, when compared with real-data-only baseline and fixed guidance scales. This suggests that AI-generated data cannot replace real clinical data, but can serve as a useful transfer learning signal when carefully integrated into the training pipelines.

Scientific Reports
Indiana University Health (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Kingston University London (GB), Mallinckrodt (United States) (US), Indiana Cancer Consortium (US), Kingston University (US), Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.