Review of numerical methods for dating Quaternary volcanism

Abstract. The quality of the numerical age estimates used to establish the eruption chronology of a volcanic field is a critical control on the dependability of temporal hazard assessments. However, researchers involved in hazard assessment and modelling may be unfamiliar with dating methods and their complexities, which are needed to assess the quality of published ages. This paper aims to increase the awareness regarding the quality of geochronological data by providing brief introductions to the principles and applications of the dating methods applicable to Quaternary volcanism. The numerical dating methods included in this review are as follows: 40K / 40Ar and 40Ar / 39Ar dating, radiocarbon dating, uranium-series-related dating, cosmogenic nuclide exposure dating, and luminescence dating, as well as tephrostratigraphy and annual layer counting. First, the physical phenomena utilised by each method to provide age estimates are presented and then concerns related to the application of these methods are discussed, including necessary calibration steps and possible sources of error. This is followed by examples of the application of each of the methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
E&G Quaternary Science Journal
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/egqsj-75-131-2026
Primary Topic
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Review of numerical methods for dating Quaternary volcanism

Daniela Mueller, William McCreary, Elena Serra, Frank Preusser et al.
E&G Quaternary Science Journal
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
article

Review of numerical methods for dating Quaternary volcanism

Daniela Mueller, William McCreary, Elena Serra, Frank Preusser, Venera May
article en

Abstract

Abstract. The quality of the numerical age estimates used to establish the eruption chronology of a volcanic field is a critical control on the dependability of temporal hazard assessments. However, researchers involved in hazard assessment and modelling may be unfamiliar with dating methods and their complexities, which are needed to assess the quality of published ages. This paper aims to increase the awareness regarding the quality of geochronological data by providing brief introductions to the principles and applications of the dating methods applicable to Quaternary volcanism. The numerical dating methods included in this review are as follows: 40K / 40Ar and 40Ar / 39Ar dating, radiocarbon dating, uranium-series-related dating, cosmogenic nuclide exposure dating, and luminescence dating, as well as tephrostratigraphy and annual layer counting. First, the physical phenomena utilised by each method to provide age estimates are presented and then concerns related to the application of these methods are discussed, including necessary calibration steps and possible sources of error. This is followed by examples of the application of each of the methods.

E&G Quaternary Science JournalVol. 75(1)
University of Liverpool (GB), University of Freiburg (DE), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of Lausanne (CH)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.