Knowledge of cancer genetics and attitudes about genetic counseling and testing: a randomized trial of the Know Your Risk intervention compared to conventional genetic counseling

PURPOSE: To determine if the developed Know Your Risk (KYR) intervention is similar to conventional genetic counseling; we evaluated participants' knowledge of cancer genetics, breast cancer risk perception, attitudes about genetic counseling and testing, and satisfaction with genetic counseling. METHODS: Women (n = 866) who screened at elevated risk for breast cancer were randomized to the KYR intervention or conventional genetic counseling (2022-2024). The KYR intervention included a series of online pre-test educational videos, direct access to genetic testing, and patient preference for receiving post-test genetic counseling. Participants completed surveys at baseline and after genetic counseling and testing. Non-inferiority hypothesis testing compared the two participant groups. RESULTS: The mean knowledge score (range 0-12) increased in both study groups from a baseline mean of 6.87 (standard deviation (SD) = 2.46) to 8.66 (SD = 2.16) for the KYR intervention and 8.56 (SD = 2.14) for conventional counseling. Additionally, statistical analyses suggest the non-inferiority of the KYR intervention for participants' accuracy of their breast cancer risk, attitudes about genetic counseling and genetic testing, and satisfaction with genetic counseling compared to participants randomized to conventional genetic counseling. CONCLUSION: Findings support that the components included in the KYR intervention are non-inferior for cancer genetic knowledge, risk perception, genetic counseling and testing attitudes, and genetic counseling satisfaction among women who screen at elevated risk for breast cancer. By using the combination of components included in the KYR intervention, genetic counseling and genetic testing are more accessible, convenient, and patient-driven. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05325151.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Causes & Control
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-026-02207-3
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge of cancer genetics and attitudes about genetic counseling and testing: a randomized trial of the Know Your Risk intervention compared to conventional genetic counseling

Leigha Senter, Kevin Sweet, Christina Spears, Patrick Schnell et al.
Cancer Causes & Control
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Knowledge of cancer genetics and attitudes about genetic counseling and testing: a randomized trial of the Know Your Risk intervention compared to conventional genetic counseling

Leigha Senter, Kevin Sweet, Christina Spears, Patrick Schnell, Mira L. Katz, J. N. Cooper, Doreen M. Agnese, Kate P. Shane-Carson, Amanda E. Toland, Amber Aeilts, Paul L. Reiter, Jordan Brown
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if the developed Know Your Risk (KYR) intervention is similar to conventional genetic counseling; we evaluated participants' knowledge of cancer genetics, breast cancer risk perception, attitudes about genetic counseling and testing, and satisfaction with genetic counseling. METHODS: Women (n = 866) who screened at elevated risk for breast cancer were randomized to the KYR intervention or conventional genetic counseling (2022-2024). The KYR intervention included a series of online pre-test educational videos, direct access to genetic testing, and patient preference for receiving post-test genetic counseling. Participants completed surveys at baseline and after genetic counseling and testing. Non-inferiority hypothesis testing compared the two participant groups. RESULTS: The mean knowledge score (range 0-12) increased in both study groups from a baseline mean of 6.87 (standard deviation (SD) = 2.46) to 8.66 (SD = 2.16) for the KYR intervention and 8.56 (SD = 2.14) for conventional counseling. Additionally, statistical analyses suggest the non-inferiority of the KYR intervention for participants' accuracy of their breast cancer risk, attitudes about genetic counseling and genetic testing, and satisfaction with genetic counseling compared to participants randomized to conventional genetic counseling. CONCLUSION: Findings support that the components included in the KYR intervention are non-inferior for cancer genetic knowledge, risk perception, genetic counseling and testing attitudes, and genetic counseling satisfaction among women who screen at elevated risk for breast cancer. By using the combination of components included in the KYR intervention, genetic counseling and genetic testing are more accessible, convenient, and patient-driven. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05325151.

Cancer Causes & ControlVol. 37(7)
Ohio Department of Health (US), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US), The Ohio State University (US)
National Cancer Institute
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.