The New Brunswick Colon Cancer Screening Program: Are above-average-risk New Brunswick residents falling through the cracks?

The New Brunswick Colon Cancer Screening Program (NBCCSP) rejects individuals deemed above average risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) on the presumption that screening will occur via primary care providers. We examined the CRC screening outcomes among a retrospective cohort of patients deemed not average risk (NAR) and rejected from the NBCCSP. Within a randomly selected subset of 191 NAR patients with accessible data and no prior CRC screening, 120 (62.8%) remained unscreened at the end of the study period. In a matched case-control study, NAR patients who received colonoscopies waited nearly a year longer than average-risk individuals. Furthermore, NAR patients also waited significantly longer for a diagnosis of cancer compared to average-risk patients. Above-average-risk patients would benefit from expanded programmatic screening of the NBCCSP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/25160435261464428
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The New Brunswick Colon Cancer Screening Program: Are above-average-risk New Brunswick residents falling through the cracks?

Leanne Skerry, Natasha Hanson, Tracy A. Freeze, Stephen A Smith
Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

The New Brunswick Colon Cancer Screening Program: Are above-average-risk New Brunswick residents falling through the cracks?

Leanne Skerry, Natasha Hanson, Tracy A. Freeze, Stephen A Smith
article en

Abstract

The New Brunswick Colon Cancer Screening Program (NBCCSP) rejects individuals deemed above average risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) on the presumption that screening will occur via primary care providers. We examined the CRC screening outcomes among a retrospective cohort of patients deemed not average risk (NAR) and rejected from the NBCCSP. Within a randomly selected subset of 191 NAR patients with accessible data and no prior CRC screening, 120 (62.8%) remained unscreened at the end of the study period. In a matched case-control study, NAR patients who received colonoscopies waited nearly a year longer than average-risk individuals. Furthermore, NAR patients also waited significantly longer for a diagnosis of cancer compared to average-risk patients. Above-average-risk patients would benefit from expanded programmatic screening of the NBCCSP.

Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management
Horizon Health Network (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.