Effect of Biochar as an Additive in Co-Composting: Impacts on Physicochemical Properties, Enzyme Activity, and Substrate Quality

The growing demand for sustainable alternatives to non-renewable growing media components, such as sphagnum peat, has driven interest in compost–biochar combinations as high-quality horticultural substrates. Nevertheless, the effects of incorporating biochar at the onset of co-composting on process dynamics and the quality of the resulting end-products remain poorly understood and insufficiently characterized. This study evaluated the influence of hardwood residue-derived biochar as an additive on the co-composting of corn stover and swine manure under greenhouse conditions over 94 days. Three treatments were established: a Control (C; without biochar), CB1 (10% v/v biochar), and CB2 (20% v/v biochar), each with three replicates. Physicochemical properties (pH, electrical conductivity, water holding capacity, bulk density, particle size distribution, total organic carbon), enzyme activities (FDA hydrolysis, dehydrogenase, urease, arginine ammonification, acid phosphatase, arylsulfatase), compost stability (Solvita® test), and phytotoxicity (germination index) were monitored throughout the process and at process completion. Results showed that biochar addition significantly influenced physicochemical and biological parameters in a dose-dependent manner. The CB2 treatment reduced electrical conductivity by 46% relative to the Control (1.87 vs. 3.45 mS/cm) and increased water-holding capacity by 32% (479 vs. 364%), while all treatments met the Chilean composting standard NCh 2880. Enzyme activities were generally higher in the Control and CB1 treatments, indicating that high biochar rates may limit microbial activity due to recalcitrant carbon inputs, yet a 20% biochar addition improved compost maturity and reduced phytotoxicity. These findings indicate that, within the tested range (10–20% v/v), biochar incorporation appears to enhance the quality, supporting its potential as a sustainable component in growing media formulations as an alternative to peat.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agronomy
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16131268
Primary Topic
Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Biochar as an Additive in Co-Composting: Impacts on Physicochemical Properties, Enzyme Activity, and Substrate Quality

Humberto Aponte, Marcela Calabi-Floody, Uri Aceituno-Valenzuela, Rodrigo Iván Contreras‐Soto et al.
Agronomy
Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
article

Effect of Biochar as an Additive in Co-Composting: Impacts on Physicochemical Properties, Enzyme Activity, and Substrate Quality

Humberto Aponte, Marcela Calabi-Floody, Uri Aceituno-Valenzuela, Rodrigo Iván Contreras‐Soto, Claudia Rojas, Gonzalo Carreño, Jorge Medina, Ricardo Marambio
article en

Abstract

The growing demand for sustainable alternatives to non-renewable growing media components, such as sphagnum peat, has driven interest in compost–biochar combinations as high-quality horticultural substrates. Nevertheless, the effects of incorporating biochar at the onset of co-composting on process dynamics and the quality of the resulting end-products remain poorly understood and insufficiently characterized. This study evaluated the influence of hardwood residue-derived biochar as an additive on the co-composting of corn stover and swine manure under greenhouse conditions over 94 days. Three treatments were established: a Control (C; without biochar), CB1 (10% v/v biochar), and CB2 (20% v/v biochar), each with three replicates. Physicochemical properties (pH, electrical conductivity, water holding capacity, bulk density, particle size distribution, total organic carbon), enzyme activities (FDA hydrolysis, dehydrogenase, urease, arginine ammonification, acid phosphatase, arylsulfatase), compost stability (Solvita® test), and phytotoxicity (germination index) were monitored throughout the process and at process completion. Results showed that biochar addition significantly influenced physicochemical and biological parameters in a dose-dependent manner. The CB2 treatment reduced electrical conductivity by 46% relative to the Control (1.87 vs. 3.45 mS/cm) and increased water-holding capacity by 32% (479 vs. 364%), while all treatments met the Chilean composting standard NCh 2880. Enzyme activities were generally higher in the Control and CB1 treatments, indicating that high biochar rates may limit microbial activity due to recalcitrant carbon inputs, yet a 20% biochar addition improved compost maturity and reduced phytotoxicity. These findings indicate that, within the tested range (10–20% v/v), biochar incorporation appears to enhance the quality, supporting its potential as a sustainable component in growing media formulations as an alternative to peat.

AgronomyVol. 16(13)
Universidad de La Frontera (CL), University of O'Higgins (CL), Centro de Estudios Científicos (CL)
Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo, Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.