A Core Outcome Set for Family-Centered Care in Neonatal Intensive Care Settings: An International eDelphi Study and Online Consensus Meeting

Background/Objectives: Family-centered care (FCC) in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) can improve infant and family outcomes. Inconsistencies in outcome reporting across FCC trials limits the comparability of findings. Aim: To develop a core outcome set (COS) for evaluating FCC interventions in neonatal intensive care settings. Methods: A list of outcomes was generated through systematic reviews and stakeholder focus groups. A three-round eDelphi study with stakeholders was conducted, followed by an expert consensus meeting. Results: The reviews and focus groups identified 72 outcomes for round 1. Sixty-three healthcare professionals (HCP), 37 parents and five ex-NICU patients completed round 1, with 12 new outcomes suggested. In round 2, 54 HCP, 28 parents and four ex-NICU patients scored 84 outcomes, resulting in the exclusion of 12 low-importance outcomes. In round 3, 45 HCP, 28 parents, and two ex-NICU patients scored the remaining 72 outcomes. Overall, 71% of participants completed all three rounds. Round 3 yielded 48 outcomes that met the predefined consensus criteria and were taken forward to the expert consensus meeting. The final 10 COS outcomes included six outcomes related to parents, namely, bonding with their infant, participation in care, parental readiness for discharge, stress, shared decision-making, and parental knowledge of the infant’s care and treatment, and four outcomes related to infants, namely, infant pain and stress, growth, nosocomial infection, and length of NICU stays. Conclusions: A COS for FCC research and practice in neonatal intensive care settings has been established. Implementation of this COS may improve reporting consistency and strengthen evidence synthesis across FCC trails, thereby better informing care delivery in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Children
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/children13070862
Primary Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Core Outcome Set for Family-Centered Care in Neonatal Intensive Care Settings: An International eDelphi Study and Online Consensus Meeting

Mary A. Ryan, Anna Zanin, Jos M. Latour, Cansel Kocakabak et al.
Children
Delphi Technique in Research
article

A Core Outcome Set for Family-Centered Care in Neonatal Intensive Care Settings: An International eDelphi Study and Online Consensus Meeting

Mary A. Ryan, Anna Zanin, Jos M. Latour, Cansel Kocakabak, Pernilla Rönnholm, Anna Axelin, Karen Benzies, Pat Schofield, Nicole R. van Veenendaal, Agnes van den Hoogen, Marsha Campbell‐Yeo, Linda S. Franck, Beatrix Callard, Aurelia Abenstein, Livia N. Bonnard, Eleni Vavouraki
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Family-centered care (FCC) in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) can improve infant and family outcomes. Inconsistencies in outcome reporting across FCC trials limits the comparability of findings. Aim: To develop a core outcome set (COS) for evaluating FCC interventions in neonatal intensive care settings. Methods: A list of outcomes was generated through systematic reviews and stakeholder focus groups. A three-round eDelphi study with stakeholders was conducted, followed by an expert consensus meeting. Results: The reviews and focus groups identified 72 outcomes for round 1. Sixty-three healthcare professionals (HCP), 37 parents and five ex-NICU patients completed round 1, with 12 new outcomes suggested. In round 2, 54 HCP, 28 parents and four ex-NICU patients scored 84 outcomes, resulting in the exclusion of 12 low-importance outcomes. In round 3, 45 HCP, 28 parents, and two ex-NICU patients scored the remaining 72 outcomes. Overall, 71% of participants completed all three rounds. Round 3 yielded 48 outcomes that met the predefined consensus criteria and were taken forward to the expert consensus meeting. The final 10 COS outcomes included six outcomes related to parents, namely, bonding with their infant, participation in care, parental readiness for discharge, stress, shared decision-making, and parental knowledge of the infant’s care and treatment, and four outcomes related to infants, namely, infant pain and stress, growth, nosocomial infection, and length of NICU stays. Conclusions: A COS for FCC research and practice in neonatal intensive care settings has been established. Implementation of this COS may improve reporting consistency and strengthen evidence synthesis across FCC trails, thereby better informing care delivery in clinical practice.

ChildrenVol. 13(7)
Dalhousie University (CA), Foundation for Biomedical Research (US), University of Turku (FI), University of Calgary (CA), University of California, San Francisco (US), Curtin University (AU), Fudan University (CN), University College Cork (IE), Budapest University of Technology and Economics (HU), Emma Kinderziekenhuis (NL), International University of Management (NA), Swedish Society for Nature Conservation (SE), Infant (IE), University Hospital of Geneva (CH), Care-for-Rare Foundation (DE), Zhongshan Hospital (CN), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Wilhelmina Children's Hospital (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL), University of Plymouth (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Delphi Technique in Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.