AI-Driven Threat Detection and Automated Incident Response for Securing Cloud Workloads

The increasing adoption of cloud computing has expanded organizational attack surfaces and created additional opportunities for identity abuse, ransomware operations, data exposure, and configuration-related security incidents. Conventional monitoring environments based primarily on static rules, fragmented telemetry, and manual triage often struggle to prioritize high-severity incidents in real time. This study evaluates the operational impact of an integrated AI-augmented cloud-native SIEM/XDR/SOAR architecture for cloud threat detection and automated incident response. A sequential mixed-methods comparative case study was conducted across two enterprise-style security environments: an AI-augmented architecture combining cloud-native SIEM, XDR telemetry unification, behavioral analytics, AI-assisted correlation, generative-AI analyst support, and SOAR automation, and a conventional baseline environment based on manual triage and signature-based controls. Three attack scenarios were analyzed: phishing-led account takeover, multi-stage ransomware, and shadow-IT data exfiltration. The AI-augmented architecture reduced mean time to triage from 17.4 h in the conventional baseline to 10.7 min and enabled ransomware containment in under five minutes through pre-configured automated response playbooks. The results also showed improved prioritization of high-severity incidents, reduced analyst review burden, and a high automated closure rate. The findings provide operational evidence for the evaluated security architecture. Limitations include single-vendor dependency, non-equivalent false-positive classification mechanisms, proprietary model internals, calibration requirements, and detection gaps involving legitimate third-party services and password-protected content.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16136454
Primary Topic
Information and Cyber Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-Driven Threat Detection and Automated Incident Response for Securing Cloud Workloads

Veselina Spasova, Fatima Sapundzhi, Teodora Bakardjieva, Andriana Ivanova et al.
Applied Sciences
Information and Cyber Security
article

AI-Driven Threat Detection and Automated Incident Response for Securing Cloud Workloads

Veselina Spasova, Fatima Sapundzhi, Teodora Bakardjieva, Andriana Ivanova, Anton Chagovec, Antonina Ivanova
article en

Abstract

The increasing adoption of cloud computing has expanded organizational attack surfaces and created additional opportunities for identity abuse, ransomware operations, data exposure, and configuration-related security incidents. Conventional monitoring environments based primarily on static rules, fragmented telemetry, and manual triage often struggle to prioritize high-severity incidents in real time. This study evaluates the operational impact of an integrated AI-augmented cloud-native SIEM/XDR/SOAR architecture for cloud threat detection and automated incident response. A sequential mixed-methods comparative case study was conducted across two enterprise-style security environments: an AI-augmented architecture combining cloud-native SIEM, XDR telemetry unification, behavioral analytics, AI-assisted correlation, generative-AI analyst support, and SOAR automation, and a conventional baseline environment based on manual triage and signature-based controls. Three attack scenarios were analyzed: phishing-led account takeover, multi-stage ransomware, and shadow-IT data exfiltration. The AI-augmented architecture reduced mean time to triage from 17.4 h in the conventional baseline to 10.7 min and enabled ransomware containment in under five minutes through pre-configured automated response playbooks. The results also showed improved prioritization of high-severity incidents, reduced analyst review burden, and a high automated closure rate. The findings provide operational evidence for the evaluated security architecture. Limitations include single-vendor dependency, non-equivalent false-positive classification mechanisms, proprietary model internals, calibration requirements, and detection gaps involving legitimate third-party services and password-protected content.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(13)
South-West University "Neofit Rilski" (BG), Nikola Vaptsarov Naval Academy (BG), Varna Free University (BG)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Information and Cyber Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.