Radiographers’ readiness for artificial intelligence (AI) leadership: confidence, challenges and role expectations in the UK

BACKGROUND: With the rapid implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiographer workflows, leadership roles are necessary for its safe and effective integration into practice. Due to their dual professional identity (encompassing patient-centred care skills and technical skills) radiographers emerge as natural AI leaders within the medical imaging and radiotherapy ecosystems. AIM: To examine how UK radiographers perceive their readiness, confidence and potential roles in AI leadership, and to identify the barriers and enablers for their engagement within the AI-ecosystem. METHODS: A UK-wide, cross-sectional, online survey of radiographers and students (n=273) combined demographic questions, AI knowledge and experience questions, Likert-type assessments of preparedness and free text responses. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and Mann-Whitney U tests; qualitative data underwent thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Most respondents reported limited AI literacy and minimal hands-on experience, citing insufficient education, protected time and managerial support as key barriers to leadership readiness. Confidence varied: women and those with little AI exposure, expressed statistically significant lower confidence to lead in AI-enabled environments. Respondents felt more comfortable taking on leadership responsibilities once AI systems were already in place than leading their implementation. Qualitative findings indicated that in this predominantly frontline sample, radiographers described AI leadership mainly as operational, practice-based work. Motivations for leadership focused on improving workflows, supporting colleagues and ensuring safe practice. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: Radiographers recognise the relevance of AI leadership but understand it as practice-proximal, operational-focused responsibilities, due to limited AI exposure, uneven confidence and the absence of defined leadership pathways in national policy. Role ambiguity and limited experiential learning constrain radiographers' ability to envision strategic or organisation-wide AI leadership. Profession-specific education, structured experiential opportunities and organisational support are essential for enabling radiographers to participate equitably and effectively in AI-enabled service transformation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Leader
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2025-001513
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radiographers’ readiness for artificial intelligence (AI) leadership: confidence, challenges and role expectations in the UK

Christina Malamateniou, Janice St. John-Matthews, G. Walsh, Yiannis Kyratsis et al.
BMJ Leader
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Radiographers’ readiness for artificial intelligence (AI) leadership: confidence, challenges and role expectations in the UK

Christina Malamateniou, Janice St. John-Matthews, G. Walsh, Yiannis Kyratsis, DR Benard Ohene-Botwe, Amanda Goodall
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the rapid implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiographer workflows, leadership roles are necessary for its safe and effective integration into practice. Due to their dual professional identity (encompassing patient-centred care skills and technical skills) radiographers emerge as natural AI leaders within the medical imaging and radiotherapy ecosystems. AIM: To examine how UK radiographers perceive their readiness, confidence and potential roles in AI leadership, and to identify the barriers and enablers for their engagement within the AI-ecosystem. METHODS: A UK-wide, cross-sectional, online survey of radiographers and students (n=273) combined demographic questions, AI knowledge and experience questions, Likert-type assessments of preparedness and free text responses. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and Mann-Whitney U tests; qualitative data underwent thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Most respondents reported limited AI literacy and minimal hands-on experience, citing insufficient education, protected time and managerial support as key barriers to leadership readiness. Confidence varied: women and those with little AI exposure, expressed statistically significant lower confidence to lead in AI-enabled environments. Respondents felt more comfortable taking on leadership responsibilities once AI systems were already in place than leading their implementation. Qualitative findings indicated that in this predominantly frontline sample, radiographers described AI leadership mainly as operational, practice-based work. Motivations for leadership focused on improving workflows, supporting colleagues and ensuring safe practice. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: Radiographers recognise the relevance of AI leadership but understand it as practice-proximal, operational-focused responsibilities, due to limited AI exposure, uneven confidence and the absence of defined leadership pathways in national policy. Role ambiguity and limited experiential learning constrain radiographers' ability to envision strategic or organisation-wide AI leadership. Profession-specific education, structured experiential opportunities and organisational support are essential for enabling radiographers to participate equitably and effectively in AI-enabled service transformation.

BMJ Leader
Department of Health and Social Care (GB), St George's, University of London (GB), City, University of London (GB), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
College of Radiographers, UK Research and Innovation, Economic and Social Research Council
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.