Semi‐Quantitative Monitoring of Plant‐Arthropod Interactions by <scp>eDNA</scp> Metabarcoding of Individual Flowers and Leaves

Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis has revolutionized our ability to study plant-arthropod interaction diversity. However, the method has one main limitation: while it accurately recovers the presence of individual species, it has limited quantitative recording capabilities. Recent work suggests that this problem can be overcome by processing replicate eDNA samples at individual sites. The naive occupancy of a species within a replicate sample approximates its relative abundance or its interaction strength with the sampled matrix. However, this approach will lead to a significant increase in the necessary workload and costs, especially as the usually applied filtering of eDNA samples is laborious and expensive. Here, we explore the option to directly extract eDNA from individual leaves and flowers omitting a filtration step. We test different isolation protocols and compare the results with a conventional filtration-based protocol. We show that simple precipitation suffices to recover community-level eDNA of arthropods from individual flowers, significantly reducing costs and efforts. We then test our optimized protocol in two apple orchards in Germany, where we sample individual leaf and flower samples. Our protocol reliably recovers typical orchard-associated arthropod species across broad ecological guilds. The naive occupancy-based abundances of these species reflect the expected community composition in orchards very well. For comparative purposes, we also performed a conventional, quantitative bee monitoring in the orchards using window traps. Based on this monitoring, we show that replicate sampling of flowers is even a promising option to semi-quantitatively recover bee pollinators and their ecological interaction diversity from eDNA. Simplified replicate eDNA sampling will considerably improve our ability to characterize arthropod communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.73831
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Semi‐Quantitative Monitoring of Plant‐Arthropod Interactions by eDNA Metabarcoding of Individual Flowers and Leaves

Christian Maus, Michael E. Grevé, Henrik Krehenwinkel, Christian Ulrich Baden et al.
Ecology and Evolution
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
article

Semi‐Quantitative Monitoring of Plant‐Arthropod Interactions by eDNA Metabarcoding of Individual Flowers and Leaves

Christian Maus, Michael E. Grevé, Henrik Krehenwinkel, Christian Ulrich Baden, Arndt Schmidt, Merve Tello, Joanna Hank
article en

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis has revolutionized our ability to study plant-arthropod interaction diversity. However, the method has one main limitation: while it accurately recovers the presence of individual species, it has limited quantitative recording capabilities. Recent work suggests that this problem can be overcome by processing replicate eDNA samples at individual sites. The naive occupancy of a species within a replicate sample approximates its relative abundance or its interaction strength with the sampled matrix. However, this approach will lead to a significant increase in the necessary workload and costs, especially as the usually applied filtering of eDNA samples is laborious and expensive. Here, we explore the option to directly extract eDNA from individual leaves and flowers omitting a filtration step. We test different isolation protocols and compare the results with a conventional filtration-based protocol. We show that simple precipitation suffices to recover community-level eDNA of arthropods from individual flowers, significantly reducing costs and efforts. We then test our optimized protocol in two apple orchards in Germany, where we sample individual leaf and flower samples. Our protocol reliably recovers typical orchard-associated arthropod species across broad ecological guilds. The naive occupancy-based abundances of these species reflect the expected community composition in orchards very well. For comparative purposes, we also performed a conventional, quantitative bee monitoring in the orchards using window traps. Based on this monitoring, we show that replicate sampling of flowers is even a promising option to semi-quantitatively recover bee pollinators and their ecological interaction diversity from eDNA. Simplified replicate eDNA sampling will considerably improve our ability to characterize arthropod communities.

Ecology and EvolutionVol. 16(7)
Bayer (Germany) (DE), Universität Trier (DE)
Bayer
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.