Cephalometric Norms for Chinese Individuals Based on Expert Consensus Evaluation of Lateral Cephalometric Radiographs.

OBJECTIVE: To establish cephalometric normative reference values based on the subjective consensus of Chinese orthodontic experts regarding the evaluation of lateral cephalometric radiographs. METHODS: This study included 120 patients in the permanent dentition stage who visited the Department of Orthodontics at Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology between 2022 and 2025. The participants were divided into two groups: an adolescent group (n = 60, aged 14.40 ± 1.70 years, 30 boys and 30 girls) and an adult group (n = 60, aged 24.33 ± 5.65 years, 30 men and 30 women). Lateral cephalometric radiographs were analysed by two PhD students and one postdoctoral researcher from the Department of Orthodontics. Through statistical analysis, cephalometric normative values were established for Tweed, Downs, Steiner and Peking University analysis methods as well as for soft tissue measurements, and comparisons were made between the two age groups. RESULTS: A reference standard for cephalometric normative values was developed, reflecting the consensus of Chinese orthodontic experts in assessing profile harmony. Significant differences (P 0.05) were identified between the adolescent and adult groups in the normative values of FMA (MPA), GoGN/SN, SE and G-Sn-Pos. CONCLUSION: Expert consensus evaluation of lateral cephalometric radiographs provides a more objective basis for identifying harmonious samples. This enables the derivation of more accurate cephalometric normative values for sagittal skeletal measurements and soft tissue parameters.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3290/j.cjdr.b7044059
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cephalometric Norms for Chinese Individuals Based on Expert Consensus Evaluation of Lateral Cephalometric Radiographs.

He Chen, Han Wei Zheng, Guang Ying Song, Tian Min Xu et al.
PubMed
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Cephalometric Norms for Chinese Individuals Based on Expert Consensus Evaluation of Lateral Cephalometric Radiographs.

He Chen, Han Wei Zheng, Guang Ying Song, Tian Min Xu, Chen Da Meng, Yue Lai, Bing Han
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish cephalometric normative reference values based on the subjective consensus of Chinese orthodontic experts regarding the evaluation of lateral cephalometric radiographs. METHODS: This study included 120 patients in the permanent dentition stage who visited the Department of Orthodontics at Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology between 2022 and 2025. The participants were divided into two groups: an adolescent group (n = 60, aged 14.40 ± 1.70 years, 30 boys and 30 girls) and an adult group (n = 60, aged 24.33 ± 5.65 years, 30 men and 30 women). Lateral cephalometric radiographs were analysed by two PhD students and one postdoctoral researcher from the Department of Orthodontics. Through statistical analysis, cephalometric normative values were established for Tweed, Downs, Steiner and Peking University analysis methods as well as for soft tissue measurements, and comparisons were made between the two age groups. RESULTS: A reference standard for cephalometric normative values was developed, reflecting the consensus of Chinese orthodontic experts in assessing profile harmony. Significant differences (P 0.05) were identified between the adolescent and adult groups in the normative values of FMA (MPA), GoGN/SN, SE and G-Sn-Pos. CONCLUSION: Expert consensus evaluation of lateral cephalometric radiographs provides a more objective basis for identifying harmonious samples. This enables the derivation of more accurate cephalometric normative values for sagittal skeletal measurements and soft tissue parameters.

PubMedVol. 29(2)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.