Association between family-perceived quality of death and dying, prognostic awareness, and end-of-life discussions in five common diseases: a nationwide mortality follow-back study

INTRODUCTION: Discussing prognosis and end-of-life (EOL) care with patients and physicians is a sensitive and critical aspect of EOL care. However, the association between prognostic awareness and EOL discussions and the quality of death and dying (QOD) remains uncertain. This study aimed to describe prognostic awareness and participation in EOL discussions among patients with common causes of death and to clarify their association with QOD. METHODS: Retrospective nationwide mortality follow-back survey in Japan (Feb 2019; Feb 2020). Bereaved families of patients who died in hospitals or at home from cancer, heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, pneumonia, or renal failure. The primary outcome was family-reported QOD. Exposures of interest included family-reported prognostic awareness and EOL discussions, including care settings and code statuses. Analyses were conducted separately by disease category and place of death. Logistic regression and generalized linear models were used for analysis. RESULTS: Of the 115,861 family members who were sent the questionnaires, we finally analyzed 50,641 responses. Accurate patient prognostic awareness ranged from 56.8% to 70.2% for patients with cancer and from 30.5% to 53.3% for patients with non-cancer diseases. Patient-physician discussions about care settings occurred in 36.4%-54.8% of hospital deaths and 67.8%-81.5% of home deaths across diseases. There were small differences in the QOD scores between patients with accurate and inaccurate prognostic awareness across most subgroups. However, participation in EOL discussions was associated with higher QOD scores than non-participation. The largest QOD score difference was observed in patients who died from pneumonia in hospitals, with discussions about care settings (64.0 versus without 42.6) showing a difference of 21.4 (95% confidence interval: 16.3, 26.5). CONCLUSIONS: Participation in EOL discussions was associated with higher family-reported QOD across diseases and places of death in this observational study. Similar patterns were observed among patients who died in hospital settings. These findings suggest that EOL discussions may be related to QOD beyond the final place of death.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Palliative Care
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-026-02205-x
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association between family-perceived quality of death and dying, prognostic awareness, and end-of-life discussions in five common diseases: a nationwide mortality follow-back study

Yoshiyuki Kizawa, Tatsuya Morita, Yoko Nakazawa, Yasuyuki Okumura et al.
BMC Palliative Care
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Association between family-perceived quality of death and dying, prognostic awareness, and end-of-life discussions in five common diseases: a nationwide mortality follow-back study

Yoshiyuki Kizawa, Tatsuya Morita, Yoko Nakazawa, Yasuyuki Okumura, Asao Ogawa, Risa Yamazaki, Masanori Mori, Shohei Kawagoe, Mitsunori Miyashita, Hiroshi Yamamoto, Emi Takeuchi
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Discussing prognosis and end-of-life (EOL) care with patients and physicians is a sensitive and critical aspect of EOL care. However, the association between prognostic awareness and EOL discussions and the quality of death and dying (QOD) remains uncertain. This study aimed to describe prognostic awareness and participation in EOL discussions among patients with common causes of death and to clarify their association with QOD. METHODS: Retrospective nationwide mortality follow-back survey in Japan (Feb 2019; Feb 2020). Bereaved families of patients who died in hospitals or at home from cancer, heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, pneumonia, or renal failure. The primary outcome was family-reported QOD. Exposures of interest included family-reported prognostic awareness and EOL discussions, including care settings and code statuses. Analyses were conducted separately by disease category and place of death. Logistic regression and generalized linear models were used for analysis. RESULTS: Of the 115,861 family members who were sent the questionnaires, we finally analyzed 50,641 responses. Accurate patient prognostic awareness ranged from 56.8% to 70.2% for patients with cancer and from 30.5% to 53.3% for patients with non-cancer diseases. Patient-physician discussions about care settings occurred in 36.4%-54.8% of hospital deaths and 67.8%-81.5% of home deaths across diseases. There were small differences in the QOD scores between patients with accurate and inaccurate prognostic awareness across most subgroups. However, participation in EOL discussions was associated with higher QOD scores than non-participation. The largest QOD score difference was observed in patients who died from pneumonia in hospitals, with discussions about care settings (64.0 versus without 42.6) showing a difference of 21.4 (95% confidence interval: 16.3, 26.5). CONCLUSIONS: Participation in EOL discussions was associated with higher family-reported QOD across diseases and places of death in this observational study. Similar patterns were observed among patients who died in hospital settings. These findings suggest that EOL discussions may be related to QOD beyond the final place of death.

BMC Palliative Care
University of Tsukuba (JP), Tohoku University (JP), Hamamatsu University School of Medicine (JP), National Cancer Center (US), Seirei Mikatabara General Hospital (JP), Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology (JP), National Cancer Center Hospital East (JP), Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital (JP), Midorigaoka Hospital (JP), National Cancer Research Institute (GB), Kitasato University (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.