Teacher Evaluation as a Data-Use Intervention: A Frame Analysis

This multi-site ethnographic study focuses on the utility of using student growth data generated from teacher evaluations as a data-use intervention. Findings suggest that teachers developed a common perspective about evaluation but organizational contexts shaped teacher responses at the three sites differently. At two of the schools, teachers were responsible for administering their own assessments, organizing results, and presenting these results to the principal. In both schools, the data-use process was similar. Teachers administered a variety of assessments, chose from among the results, constructed artifacts metrics, and presented these metrics to the principal. At the third school, student achievement was calculated using an externally developed assessment and student growth scores were calculated at the district level. At this school, teachers maintained a unified front that disestablished the link between their performance and their students’ assessment results. The teachers maintained this stance in their interactions with colleagues and with the principal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16071036
Primary Topic
Educational Assessment and Improvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teacher Evaluation as a Data-Use Intervention: A Frame Analysis

John Lane
Education Sciences
Educational Assessment and Improvement
article

Teacher Evaluation as a Data-Use Intervention: A Frame Analysis

John Lane
article en

Abstract

This multi-site ethnographic study focuses on the utility of using student growth data generated from teacher evaluations as a data-use intervention. Findings suggest that teachers developed a common perspective about evaluation but organizational contexts shaped teacher responses at the three sites differently. At two of the schools, teachers were responsible for administering their own assessments, organizing results, and presenting these results to the principal. In both schools, the data-use process was similar. Teachers administered a variety of assessments, chose from among the results, constructed artifacts metrics, and presented these metrics to the principal. At the third school, student achievement was calculated using an externally developed assessment and student growth scores were calculated at the district level. At this school, teachers maintained a unified front that disestablished the link between their performance and their students’ assessment results. The teachers maintained this stance in their interactions with colleagues and with the principal.

Education SciencesVol. 16(7)
Michigan State University (US)
Michigan State University, College of Engineering, Michigan State University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Educational Assessment and Improvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.