Effectiveness of CADe in Colonoscopy for Improved Adenoma and Polyp Detection Under Diverse Clinical Conditions

<h3>Background/Aim:</h3> Colonoscopy is the gold standard for colorectal cancer prevention, but its effectiveness is limited by missed lesions and operator-dependent variability. Computer-aided detection (CADe) has been introduced to mitigate these limitations, yet its value for endoscopists with different levels of expertise remains unclear. This study evaluated the real-world effectiveness of CADe, focusing on its differential impact on experts and trainees under diverse clinical conditions. <h3>Patients and Methods:</h3> We conducted a retrospective, comparative study of consecutive colonoscopies performed at a tertiary center. To reduce potential selection bias, we applied 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), yielding 724 matched patients (362 CADe <i>vs.</i> 362 non-CADe). Primary outcomes were adenoma detection rate (ADR) and polyp detection rate (PDR), stratified by operator expertise, bowel preparation quality, and lesion characteristics. <h3>Results:</h3> The CADe group demonstrated significantly higher overall ADR (40.6% <i>vs.</i> 30.4%, <i>p</i>=0.004) and PDR (60.2% <i>vs.</i> 50.6%, <i>p</i>=0.011). In subgroup analyses, experts achieved a significant increase in ADR (44.7% <i>vs.</i> 34.0%, <i>p</i>=0.022) even within a lower-risk patient cohort, supporting a refinement effect. Trainees showed a numerical increase in ADR (32.2% <i>vs.</i> 25.9%, <i>p</i>=0.251) in a higher-risk cohort, with performance approaching the baseline detection rates of experts. CADe was particularly effective for detecting small polyps (≤5 mm; <i>p</i>=0.002) and in patients with optimal bowel preparation (BBPS ≥7; <i>p</i>=0.008). Significant improvements were observed in the transverse colon and descending colon. <h3>Conclusion:</h3> CADe significantly enhances adenoma and polyp detection in real-world practice. Its utility varies by operator experience, serving as a refinement tool for experts to detect subtle lesions and a safety net for trainees to bridge the experience gap. Adequate bowel preparation is essential for maximizing these benefits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
In Vivo
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.14384
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of CADe in Colonoscopy for Improved Adenoma and Polyp Detection Under Diverse Clinical Conditions

S. Park, TAEHWAN RYU, SUYEON KIM, DONG HYUN KIM et al.
In Vivo
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Effectiveness of CADe in Colonoscopy for Improved Adenoma and Polyp Detection Under Diverse Clinical Conditions

S. Park, TAEHWAN RYU, SUYEON KIM, DONG HYUN KIM, EUNBYEOL CHO
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background/Aim:</h3> Colonoscopy is the gold standard for colorectal cancer prevention, but its effectiveness is limited by missed lesions and operator-dependent variability. Computer-aided detection (CADe) has been introduced to mitigate these limitations, yet its value for endoscopists with different levels of expertise remains unclear. This study evaluated the real-world effectiveness of CADe, focusing on its differential impact on experts and trainees under diverse clinical conditions. <h3>Patients and Methods:</h3> We conducted a retrospective, comparative study of consecutive colonoscopies performed at a tertiary center. To reduce potential selection bias, we applied 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), yielding 724 matched patients (362 CADe <i>vs.</i> 362 non-CADe). Primary outcomes were adenoma detection rate (ADR) and polyp detection rate (PDR), stratified by operator expertise, bowel preparation quality, and lesion characteristics. <h3>Results:</h3> The CADe group demonstrated significantly higher overall ADR (40.6% <i>vs.</i> 30.4%, <i>p</i>=0.004) and PDR (60.2% <i>vs.</i> 50.6%, <i>p</i>=0.011). In subgroup analyses, experts achieved a significant increase in ADR (44.7% <i>vs.</i> 34.0%, <i>p</i>=0.022) even within a lower-risk patient cohort, supporting a refinement effect. Trainees showed a numerical increase in ADR (32.2% <i>vs.</i> 25.9%, <i>p</i>=0.251) in a higher-risk cohort, with performance approaching the baseline detection rates of experts. CADe was particularly effective for detecting small polyps (≤5 mm; <i>p</i>=0.002) and in patients with optimal bowel preparation (BBPS ≥7; <i>p</i>=0.008). Significant improvements were observed in the transverse colon and descending colon. <h3>Conclusion:</h3> CADe significantly enhances adenoma and polyp detection in real-world practice. Its utility varies by operator experience, serving as a refinement tool for experts to detect subtle lesions and a safety net for trainees to bridge the experience gap. Adequate bowel preparation is essential for maximizing these benefits.

In VivoVol. 40(4)
Chonnam National University (KR), Chonnam National University Hospital (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.