Artificial intelligence, ethical amplification, and systemic risk in financial markets

Abstract This paper examines the ethical and systemic implications of artificial intelligence (AI) in financial markets by developing a unified framework that integrates technical risk dynamics with societal outcomes. We introduce the Systemic Expected Shortfall with Ethical Dimensions ( $$SE{S}_{AI,Ethical}^{\alpha }$$ ), which extends traditional risk measures by incorporating distributional consequences such as inequality, bias, and disproportionate losses across stakeholders. The model identifies key AI-specific amplification channels—including speed and connectivity, bias and inequity exposure, reward hacking, model homogeneity, and orchestration fragility—through which systemic risk is generated and propagated. Illustrative market episodes, including the GameStop trading frenzy, the Flash Crash, spoofing practices, and the London Whale incident, are used to show how these mechanisms may operate in practice. The analysis shows that AI enhances efficiency under normal conditions but can amplify fragility and ethical harm under stress. The paper concludes by outlining governance implications for aligning AI-driven financial innovation with fairness, accountability, and systemic stability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-026-01241-w
Primary Topic
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence, ethical amplification, and systemic risk in financial markets

Jingrui Li
AI and Ethics
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
article

Artificial intelligence, ethical amplification, and systemic risk in financial markets

Jingrui Li
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines the ethical and systemic implications of artificial intelligence (AI) in financial markets by developing a unified framework that integrates technical risk dynamics with societal outcomes. We introduce the Systemic Expected Shortfall with Ethical Dimensions ( $$SE{S}_{AI,Ethical}^{\alpha }$$ ), which extends traditional risk measures by incorporating distributional consequences such as inequality, bias, and disproportionate losses across stakeholders. The model identifies key AI-specific amplification channels—including speed and connectivity, bias and inequity exposure, reward hacking, model homogeneity, and orchestration fragility—through which systemic risk is generated and propagated. Illustrative market episodes, including the GameStop trading frenzy, the Flash Crash, spoofing practices, and the London Whale incident, are used to show how these mechanisms may operate in practice. The analysis shows that AI enhances efficiency under normal conditions but can amplify fragility and ethical harm under stress. The paper concludes by outlining governance implications for aligning AI-driven financial innovation with fairness, accountability, and systemic stability.

AI and EthicsVol. 6(4)
Stevens Institute of Technology (US), New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Artificial intelligence, ethical amplification, and systemic risk in financial markets — Jingrui Li · AI and Ethics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS