In Vitro Comparison of Mechanical and Esthetic Properties of Different Universal-Shade Resin Composites After Simulated Aging

Background: Universal-shade resin composites (USRCs) have gained popularity for their simplified shade-matching and reduced chairside time. However, their long-term performance under oral environmental stresses remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare the mechanical and esthetic properties of five commercially available single-shade resin composites and one conventional micro-hybrid resin composite (MHRC) after simulated aging. Methods: A total of 18 disc-shaped specimens (10 mm circular × 3 mm thick) were prepared from five USRCs (Omnichroma, Zenchroma, A-Uno, TRANSCEND, and Ecosite One) and one MHRC (Clearfil AP-X). The polymerized specimen disk was polished using 2500 grit SIC paper. The mechanical properties, Vickers microhardness (HV), elastic modulus (EM) and creep (CR), and the esthetic properties, color and gloss, were measured after 24 h water storage and after 1-year stimulated aging. The data was analyzed using SPSS 27.0 software. A significance level of α = 0.05 was used for all statistical analyses. Results: Both the aging and types of material showed a significant effect on the mechanical and esthetic properties of the tested resin composite materials. The MHRC showed a significantly higher HV and EM compared to the USRC (p < 0.05). The MHRC showed significantly lower CR compared to USRC (p < 0.05). The color retention of USRCs was comparable to the MHRC (p > 0.05) and some USRCs showed superior gloss values compared with MHRC (p < 0.05). The solubility of USREs were comparable to MHRC (p > 0.05) except A-Uno which showed significantly higher solubility compared to MHRC (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it concludes that the USRC possesses inferior mechanical properties compared with the convention MHRC. Thus, their use should be limited when strong and durable mechanical properties are required under heavy occlusal stress. The use of USRCs could be beneficial for achieving a highly esthetic outcome of the restoration that does not includes the area that comes under heavy occlusal stress.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19132778
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In Vitro Comparison of Mechanical and Esthetic Properties of Different Universal-Shade Resin Composites After Simulated Aging

Nada Tawfig Hashim, Md Sofiqul Islam, Smriti Aryal A C, Vivek Padmanabhan et al.
Materials
Dental materials and restorations
article

In Vitro Comparison of Mechanical and Esthetic Properties of Different Universal-Shade Resin Composites After Simulated Aging

Nada Tawfig Hashim, Md Sofiqul Islam, Smriti Aryal A C, Vivek Padmanabhan, Upoma Guha, Misbah Sultana, Mohamed Ahmed Elsayed, Muhammed Mustahsen Rahman
article en

Abstract

Background: Universal-shade resin composites (USRCs) have gained popularity for their simplified shade-matching and reduced chairside time. However, their long-term performance under oral environmental stresses remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare the mechanical and esthetic properties of five commercially available single-shade resin composites and one conventional micro-hybrid resin composite (MHRC) after simulated aging. Methods: A total of 18 disc-shaped specimens (10 mm circular × 3 mm thick) were prepared from five USRCs (Omnichroma, Zenchroma, A-Uno, TRANSCEND, and Ecosite One) and one MHRC (Clearfil AP-X). The polymerized specimen disk was polished using 2500 grit SIC paper. The mechanical properties, Vickers microhardness (HV), elastic modulus (EM) and creep (CR), and the esthetic properties, color and gloss, were measured after 24 h water storage and after 1-year stimulated aging. The data was analyzed using SPSS 27.0 software. A significance level of α = 0.05 was used for all statistical analyses. Results: Both the aging and types of material showed a significant effect on the mechanical and esthetic properties of the tested resin composite materials. The MHRC showed a significantly higher HV and EM compared to the USRC (p < 0.05). The MHRC showed significantly lower CR compared to USRC (p < 0.05). The color retention of USRCs was comparable to the MHRC (p > 0.05) and some USRCs showed superior gloss values compared with MHRC (p < 0.05). The solubility of USREs were comparable to MHRC (p > 0.05) except A-Uno which showed significantly higher solubility compared to MHRC (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it concludes that the USRC possesses inferior mechanical properties compared with the convention MHRC. Thus, their use should be limited when strong and durable mechanical properties are required under heavy occlusal stress. The use of USRCs could be beneficial for achieving a highly esthetic outcome of the restoration that does not includes the area that comes under heavy occlusal stress.

MaterialsVol. 19(13)
University of Sharjah (AE), University of Nebraska Medical Center (US), Ras al-Khaimah Medical and Health Sciences University (AE), Assiut University (EG)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.