Molecular profiling of breast cancer pleural effusions using cytology specimens: Impact of sample source and cytological features on next‐generation sequencing performance

BACKGROUND: Malignant effusions in breast cancer are a minimally invasive source for molecular profiling. Effusion-derived cytology specimens, cell blocks (CB) and post-ThinPrep PreservCyt (PTPC) supernatant, are reliable sources for molecular testing but differ in DNA concentration and turnaround time (TAT). This study evaluates mutational profiles, cytology characteristics, and clinical correlates to assess the utility of effusion-based molecular testing in breast cancer. METHODS: The authors screened 2400 malignant effusion cases, identifying 22 cases of breast adenocarcinoma effusions that underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS). Both CB and PTPC supernatant were evaluated for tumor cellularity, fluid volume, DNA concentration, TAT, and mutation detection. Associations with clinicopathological features and outcomes were explored. RESULTS: NGS was successful in all 22 cases (mean volume, 426.5 mL; mean tumor cellularity, 50%). Successful sequencing was achieved in low volume samples with high tumor cellularity. Higher tumor cellularity (>50%) was associated with bloody effusions (p = .016). PTPC supernatant yielded 5-fold higher DNA (mean 177.4 ng/µL vs. 33.8 ng/µL) and shorter TAT by 9 days (15 vs. 24 days). TP53 mutations were more common in estrogen receptor (ER)-negative and triple-negative breast effusions (p = .025). Mutations in PIK3CA, TP53, CCND1, and AKT were reliably detected. Time from diagnosis to effusion development was significantly shorter in ER negative disease (p = .001) CONCLUSIONS: Effusion cytology using PTPC supernatant, support successful NGS even in low-volume samples. ER-negative and triple-negative effusions demonstrate more aggressive molecular features including enrichment of TP53 mutations and earlier effusion development. Effusion-based molecular testing yields clinically relevant genomic information in advanced breast cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Cytopathology
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.70125
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Molecular profiling of breast cancer pleural effusions using cytology specimens: Impact of sample source and cytological features on next‐generation sequencing performance

Claire Michael, Navid Sadri, Aparna Harbhajanka, Harpreet Virk et al.
Cancer Cytopathology
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Molecular profiling of breast cancer pleural effusions using cytology specimens: Impact of sample source and cytological features on next‐generation sequencing performance

Claire Michael, Navid Sadri, Aparna Harbhajanka, Harpreet Virk, Keri Ann Pfeil, Philip Bomeisl
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Malignant effusions in breast cancer are a minimally invasive source for molecular profiling. Effusion-derived cytology specimens, cell blocks (CB) and post-ThinPrep PreservCyt (PTPC) supernatant, are reliable sources for molecular testing but differ in DNA concentration and turnaround time (TAT). This study evaluates mutational profiles, cytology characteristics, and clinical correlates to assess the utility of effusion-based molecular testing in breast cancer. METHODS: The authors screened 2400 malignant effusion cases, identifying 22 cases of breast adenocarcinoma effusions that underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS). Both CB and PTPC supernatant were evaluated for tumor cellularity, fluid volume, DNA concentration, TAT, and mutation detection. Associations with clinicopathological features and outcomes were explored. RESULTS: NGS was successful in all 22 cases (mean volume, 426.5 mL; mean tumor cellularity, 50%). Successful sequencing was achieved in low volume samples with high tumor cellularity. Higher tumor cellularity (>50%) was associated with bloody effusions (p = .016). PTPC supernatant yielded 5-fold higher DNA (mean 177.4 ng/µL vs. 33.8 ng/µL) and shorter TAT by 9 days (15 vs. 24 days). TP53 mutations were more common in estrogen receptor (ER)-negative and triple-negative breast effusions (p = .025). Mutations in PIK3CA, TP53, CCND1, and AKT were reliably detected. Time from diagnosis to effusion development was significantly shorter in ER negative disease (p = .001) CONCLUSIONS: Effusion cytology using PTPC supernatant, support successful NGS even in low-volume samples. ER-negative and triple-negative effusions demonstrate more aggressive molecular features including enrichment of TP53 mutations and earlier effusion development. Effusion-based molecular testing yields clinically relevant genomic information in advanced breast cancer.

Cancer CytopathologyVol. 134(7)
University Hospitals of Cleveland (US), Center for Clinical Research (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.