Passive Acoustic Identification of Social Groups in the Hainan Gibbon

ABSTRACT Passive monitoring based on audio or camera recordings is a valuable tool for wildlife conservation and management. The Hainan gibbon ( Nomascus hainanus ), with a global population of approximately 42 individuals, is one of the world's rarest mammals, and establishing effective monitoring approaches to understand the species' landscape use and population dynamics is a conservation priority. Hainan gibbons live in small social groups that share limited vocal characteristics. Although previous research has identified both species‐ and individual‐specific vocal signatures in gibbon calls, no studies have examined the identification of social groups from their vocalizations. We assessed the possibility of identifying gibbon social groups from their calls using deep learning, analyzing 98 8‐h recordings from three groups collected between 2015 and 2016. In a closed population with known groups, the best models recognized the calling gibbon groups with 95.24% average accuracy. When matching pairs of calls without knowledge of all groups, models identified pairs of calls with 90.70% average accuracy, falling to 64.89% for calls from unseen groups during training. Training on call sequences improved identification accuracy more than training on individual segments. Pooling votes from segment‐based predictions helped but was less effective than full sequence models. Deep learning outperformed random forests, especially on sequence‐based tasks. Analysis of confounding factors showed that gibbon acoustic signatures, not background noise, primarily influenced identification accuracy. These findings highlight the possibility of identifying gibbon social groups from their calls and the potential of deep learning to enhance acoustic passive monitoring efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.70088
Primary Topic
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Passive Acoustic Identification of Social Groups in the Hainan Gibbon

Bubacarr Bah, Heidi Ma, Emmanuel Dufourq, Stefan Britz et al.
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
article

Passive Acoustic Identification of Social Groups in the Hainan Gibbon

Bubacarr Bah, Heidi Ma, Emmanuel Dufourq, Stefan Britz, Jessica V. Bryant, Emmanuel Kabuga, Zhaoli Zhou, Sam Turvey, Ian Durbach, Zhiwei Liu, Weiwei Li, Qing Chen, Hui Lui, Nonhlanhla L. Luphade, Susan M. Cheyne
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Passive monitoring based on audio or camera recordings is a valuable tool for wildlife conservation and management. The Hainan gibbon ( Nomascus hainanus ), with a global population of approximately 42 individuals, is one of the world's rarest mammals, and establishing effective monitoring approaches to understand the species' landscape use and population dynamics is a conservation priority. Hainan gibbons live in small social groups that share limited vocal characteristics. Although previous research has identified both species‐ and individual‐specific vocal signatures in gibbon calls, no studies have examined the identification of social groups from their vocalizations. We assessed the possibility of identifying gibbon social groups from their calls using deep learning, analyzing 98 8‐h recordings from three groups collected between 2015 and 2016. In a closed population with known groups, the best models recognized the calling gibbon groups with 95.24% average accuracy. When matching pairs of calls without knowledge of all groups, models identified pairs of calls with 90.70% average accuracy, falling to 64.89% for calls from unseen groups during training. Training on call sequences improved identification accuracy more than training on individual segments. Pooling votes from segment‐based predictions helped but was less effective than full sequence models. Deep learning outperformed random forests, especially on sequence‐based tasks. Analysis of confounding factors showed that gibbon acoustic signatures, not background noise, primarily influenced identification accuracy. These findings highlight the possibility of identifying gibbon social groups from their calls and the potential of deep learning to enhance acoustic passive monitoring efforts.

Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
University of Northern Iowa (US), Oxford Brookes University (GB), Zoological Society of London (GB), National Bureau of Statistics of China (CN), Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (GB), African Institute for Mathematical Sciences (ZA), University of Cape Town (ZA), University of St Andrews (GB), Hainan University (CN), MRC Unit the Gambia (GM)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.