Risk factors and outcome for children, adolescents and young adults with grossly resected (IRS group I/II) non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas

Background The role of adjuvant therapy after gross tumor (complete or microscopically incomplete) resection in children, adolescents and young adults with non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas (NRSTS) remains controversial. Patients and methods Clinical characteristics of patients aged 0-21 years with localized NRSTS who underwent microscopically complete (IRS group I) or incomplete (IRS group II) resection prospectively enrolled in European and North American cooperative group trials from 1991 to 2018 were analyzed. Results A total of 756 patients were enrolled in the ARST0332 ( n = 27), CWS-91, -96 and -2002P ( n = 266), MMT-95 ( n = 161) and NRSTS-2005 ( n = 302) studies. Median age at diagnosis was 12.6 years [interquartile range 8.7, 15.0]. Tumors were most commonly <5 cm ( n = 465; 64%), located in the extremity ( n = 464; 61%) and had T1 stage ( n = 579, 77%). Most common tumor histotypes were synovial sarcoma ( n = 249; 33%) and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST, n = 107; 14%). Patients underwent IRS-I ( n = 434; 57%) or IRS-II ( n = 322; 43%) resection, followed by chemotherapy ( n = 302; 41%) and/or local radiotherapy ( n = 241; 33%). An additional resection was carried out in 17 IRS-II tumors, resulting in negative margins for all. Chemotherapy was more commonly added for IRS-II ( n = 193; 61%) than IRS-I tumors ( n = 109; 26%). Five-year overall survival was 88.8% (95% confidence interval, 86.5-91.2), and progression/relapse-free survival was 77.1% (74.1-80.3). Significant unfavorable prognostic factors were older age (>13 years), axial, T2 stage and large (>5 cm) tumors, MPNST histotype and high pathologic grade. Conclusion Outcome is favorable for patients with grossly resected NRSTS. Patients with unfavorable risk factors have a worse prognosis. The authors propose an algorithm to inform treatment decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ESMO rare cancers.
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmorc.2026.100519
Primary Topic
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk factors and outcome for children, adolescents and young adults with grossly resected (IRS group I/II) non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas

Aaron R. Weiss, Matthieu Carton, P. Dall'Igna, S.M. Hiniker et al.
ESMO rare cancers.
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Risk factors and outcome for children, adolescents and young adults with grossly resected (IRS group I/II) non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas

Aaron R. Weiss, Matthieu Carton, P. Dall'Igna, S.M. Hiniker, K. W. Pajtler, R. Alaggio, Sonja Chen, Simone Hettmer, Daniel H. Orbach, Monika Sparber‐Sauer, Andreas Schmidt, D.O. Walterhouse, A. Ferrari, B. Timmermann, T.B. Lautz, C. Vokuhl
article en

Abstract

Background The role of adjuvant therapy after gross tumor (complete or microscopically incomplete) resection in children, adolescents and young adults with non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas (NRSTS) remains controversial. Patients and methods Clinical characteristics of patients aged 0-21 years with localized NRSTS who underwent microscopically complete (IRS group I) or incomplete (IRS group II) resection prospectively enrolled in European and North American cooperative group trials from 1991 to 2018 were analyzed. Results A total of 756 patients were enrolled in the ARST0332 ( n = 27), CWS-91, -96 and -2002P ( n = 266), MMT-95 ( n = 161) and NRSTS-2005 ( n = 302) studies. Median age at diagnosis was 12.6 years [interquartile range 8.7, 15.0]. Tumors were most commonly <5 cm ( n = 465; 64%), located in the extremity ( n = 464; 61%) and had T1 stage ( n = 579, 77%). Most common tumor histotypes were synovial sarcoma ( n = 249; 33%) and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST, n = 107; 14%). Patients underwent IRS-I ( n = 434; 57%) or IRS-II ( n = 322; 43%) resection, followed by chemotherapy ( n = 302; 41%) and/or local radiotherapy ( n = 241; 33%). An additional resection was carried out in 17 IRS-II tumors, resulting in negative margins for all. Chemotherapy was more commonly added for IRS-II ( n = 193; 61%) than IRS-I tumors ( n = 109; 26%). Five-year overall survival was 88.8% (95% confidence interval, 86.5-91.2), and progression/relapse-free survival was 77.1% (74.1-80.3). Significant unfavorable prognostic factors were older age (>13 years), axial, T2 stage and large (>5 cm) tumors, MPNST histotype and high pathologic grade. Conclusion Outcome is favorable for patients with grossly resected NRSTS. Patients with unfavorable risk factors have a worse prognosis. The authors propose an algorithm to inform treatment decisions.

ESMO rare cancers.Vol. 7
Northwestern University (US), Nationwide Children's Hospital (US), University of Bonn (DE), University of Padua (IT), German Cancer Research Center (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), MaineHealth (US), Olgahospital (DE), Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (DE), Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IT), Lurie Children's Hospital (US), University Children's Hospital Tübingen (DE), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (IT), Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DE), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE), Institut Curie (FR), University of Tübingen (DE), Stanford University (US)
King Baudouin Foundation United States, Cancer Research Foundation, Rally Foundation, St. Baldrick's Foundation, Comer Children's Hospital, University of Chicago Medicine, Andrew McDonough B+ Foundation, Seattle Children's Foundation, Koning Boudewijnstichting, Förderkreis Krebskranke Kinder e.V. Stuttgart
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.