Dual anti-MDA5/anti-Ro52 positivity defines a high-risk subgroup for GAP stages II-III interstitial lung disease in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

Abstract Background Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). Although Gender-Age-Physiology (GAP) staging is widely used for prognostic stratification, it relies on pulmonary function testing, underscoring the need for practical markers to facilitate timely risk stratification. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 47 IIM patients with ILD at Tongji Hospital. ILD was confirmed by baseline high-resolution CT and severity was staged using the GAP index. Patients were categorized as GAP stage I (0–3 points, n = 25) or GAP stages II-III (4–8 points, n = 22). Routine laboratory parameters and anti-MDA5/anti-Ro52 profiles were compared between groups. Multivariable logistic regression was performed with GAP stages II-III (vs GAP stage I) as the outcome to evaluate the association between antibody-defined subgroups and ILD severity. Results Patients with GAP stages II-III were older than those with GAP stage I (median 58.0 vs 52.0 years, p = 0.030) and had a higher 28-day mortality (27.27% vs 0%). Anti-MDA5 positivity was more frequent in GAP stages II-III ILD than in GAP stage I (72.7% vs 40.0%, p = 0.024). Compared with GAP stage I, GAP stages II-III were characterized by reduced absolute lymphocyte counts and lymphocyte proportions, increased neutrophil proportions, elevated fibrinogen levels, and lower uric acid, while most liver and muscle injury markers were comparable. Fungal infections were more common in GAP stages II-III than in stage I (45.5% vs 16.0%, p = 0.028). In multivariable logistic regression (reference: double-negative), concurrent anti-MDA5/anti-Ro52 positivity independently associated with GAP stages II-III ILD (adjusted OR 12.03, 95% CI 1.53–94.73, p = 0.018). Conclusions Routinely available laboratory indices combined with anti-MDA5/anti-Ro52 profiling may aid rapid identification of IIM patients at high risk for GAP stages II-III ILD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European journal of medical research
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-026-04815-w
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dual anti-MDA5/anti-Ro52 positivity defines a high-risk subgroup for GAP stages II-III interstitial lung disease in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

Renren Ouyang, Fang Wang, Rujia Chen, W H Wei et al.
European journal of medical research
Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis
article

Dual anti-MDA5/anti-Ro52 positivity defines a high-risk subgroup for GAP stages II-III interstitial lung disease in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

Renren Ouyang, Fang Wang, Rujia Chen, W H Wei, T Q Wang, Xiaohui Li, Yue Wang, Yi Zhou, Hongyan Hou, Shiji Wu, Qi Chen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). Although Gender-Age-Physiology (GAP) staging is widely used for prognostic stratification, it relies on pulmonary function testing, underscoring the need for practical markers to facilitate timely risk stratification. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 47 IIM patients with ILD at Tongji Hospital. ILD was confirmed by baseline high-resolution CT and severity was staged using the GAP index. Patients were categorized as GAP stage I (0–3 points, n = 25) or GAP stages II-III (4–8 points, n = 22). Routine laboratory parameters and anti-MDA5/anti-Ro52 profiles were compared between groups. Multivariable logistic regression was performed with GAP stages II-III (vs GAP stage I) as the outcome to evaluate the association between antibody-defined subgroups and ILD severity. Results Patients with GAP stages II-III were older than those with GAP stage I (median 58.0 vs 52.0 years, p = 0.030) and had a higher 28-day mortality (27.27% vs 0%). Anti-MDA5 positivity was more frequent in GAP stages II-III ILD than in GAP stage I (72.7% vs 40.0%, p = 0.024). Compared with GAP stage I, GAP stages II-III were characterized by reduced absolute lymphocyte counts and lymphocyte proportions, increased neutrophil proportions, elevated fibrinogen levels, and lower uric acid, while most liver and muscle injury markers were comparable. Fungal infections were more common in GAP stages II-III than in stage I (45.5% vs 16.0%, p = 0.028). In multivariable logistic regression (reference: double-negative), concurrent anti-MDA5/anti-Ro52 positivity independently associated with GAP stages II-III ILD (adjusted OR 12.03, 95% CI 1.53–94.73, p = 0.018). Conclusions Routinely available laboratory indices combined with anti-MDA5/anti-Ro52 profiling may aid rapid identification of IIM patients at high risk for GAP stages II-III ILD.

European journal of medical research
Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences (CN), Tongji Hospital (CN), Hainan 301 Hospital (CN), Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.