What Australia’s new psychology Code of Conduct means for LGBTQ+ ethical practice

In December 2025, the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency introduced a new Code of Conduct for registered psychologists, replacing the Australian Psychological Society’s long-standing Code of Ethics. While regulatory reform is routine, this transition represents a significant shift in how ethical obligations are articulated, governed, and enforced, with implications for how psychologists are trained and supported to work ethically with LGBTQ+ clients. This paper examines how previous ethical guidance framed LGBTQ+ health and well-being, identifying conceptual omissions, dated assumptions, and uneven coverage across LGBTQ+ subpopulations. Drawing on this analysis, we consider how the new Code of Conduct might address – or risk reproducing – existing practice gaps, with a focus on competence, confidence, and accountability when working with marginalised subgroups. We discuss the implications for education, supervision, and continuing professional development, highlighting the need for explicit, contemporary, and inclusive ethical guidance to support culturally safe and affirming care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Education Journal
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00178969261457771
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Australia’s new psychology Code of Conduct means for LGBTQ+ ethical practice

Joel Anderson, Jacob Thomas, Ruby Grant
Health Education Journal
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

What Australia’s new psychology Code of Conduct means for LGBTQ+ ethical practice

Joel Anderson, Jacob Thomas, Ruby Grant
article en

Abstract

In December 2025, the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency introduced a new Code of Conduct for registered psychologists, replacing the Australian Psychological Society’s long-standing Code of Ethics. While regulatory reform is routine, this transition represents a significant shift in how ethical obligations are articulated, governed, and enforced, with implications for how psychologists are trained and supported to work ethically with LGBTQ+ clients. This paper examines how previous ethical guidance framed LGBTQ+ health and well-being, identifying conceptual omissions, dated assumptions, and uneven coverage across LGBTQ+ subpopulations. Drawing on this analysis, we consider how the new Code of Conduct might address – or risk reproducing – existing practice gaps, with a focus on competence, confidence, and accountability when working with marginalised subgroups. We discuss the implications for education, supervision, and continuing professional development, highlighting the need for explicit, contemporary, and inclusive ethical guidance to support culturally safe and affirming care.

Health Education Journal
La Trobe University (AU)
Australian Research Council
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.