Calculating Crisis: Development and Validation of the Crisis of Belief Scale (COBS)

Many people experience periods of severe stress or trauma in which they question and rethink their core beliefs about life. This recently conceptualized phenomenon, labeled Crisis of Belief, has been clearly theoretically specified, but has yet to be operationalized. In a series of six studies (total N = 2,739), we developed and validated a psychometric designed to measure this construct, called the Crisis of Belief Scale (COBS). Studies 1 and 2 identified items and used exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis to test the structure of the COBS. Study 3 measured COBS alongside a variety of variables to assess its convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity. Study 4 assessed its test-retest and split-half reliability. Studies 5 and 6, assessed its known-groups validity by comparing COBS scores in a sample of people experiencing homelessness (Study 5), and people in substance abuse recovery (Study 6), to that of the general population. The results of these studies support the validity of the COBS, which provides a rigorous means of measuring COB and investigating its relationships with key variables, such as depression, anxiety, life satisfaction, posttraumatic growth, and belief change. Importantly, the results indicate that COB predicts variability in key outcomes over and above variability attributable to trauma. The COBS provides a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners to understand how COB relates to well-being outcomes and processes of belief change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Loss and Trauma
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2026.2692949
Primary Topic
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Calculating Crisis: Development and Validation of the Crisis of Belief Scale (COBS)

Daniel W. Snook, Jocelyn J. Bélanger, Justin S. Bell, Liara Descartes
Journal of Loss and Trauma
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
article

Calculating Crisis: Development and Validation of the Crisis of Belief Scale (COBS)

Daniel W. Snook, Jocelyn J. Bélanger, Justin S. Bell, Liara Descartes
article en

Abstract

Many people experience periods of severe stress or trauma in which they question and rethink their core beliefs about life. This recently conceptualized phenomenon, labeled Crisis of Belief, has been clearly theoretically specified, but has yet to be operationalized. In a series of six studies (total N = 2,739), we developed and validated a psychometric designed to measure this construct, called the Crisis of Belief Scale (COBS). Studies 1 and 2 identified items and used exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis to test the structure of the COBS. Study 3 measured COBS alongside a variety of variables to assess its convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity. Study 4 assessed its test-retest and split-half reliability. Studies 5 and 6, assessed its known-groups validity by comparing COBS scores in a sample of people experiencing homelessness (Study 5), and people in substance abuse recovery (Study 6), to that of the general population. The results of these studies support the validity of the COBS, which provides a rigorous means of measuring COB and investigating its relationships with key variables, such as depression, anxiety, life satisfaction, posttraumatic growth, and belief change. Importantly, the results indicate that COB predicts variability in key outcomes over and above variability attributable to trauma. The COBS provides a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners to understand how COB relates to well-being outcomes and processes of belief change.

Journal of Loss and Trauma
DePaul University (US), Florida Gulf Coast University (US), Carnegie Mellon University Qatar (QA)
American Psychological Association Divisions
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.