Pathodashboard: an epidemiological atlas for tumour diagnostics

BACKGROUND: The availability of comparable epidemiological data on malignant tumours remains limited due to heterogeneous classification systems, divergent reference frameworks, and inconsistent case definitions. Incomplete data collection and an often biased focus on specific subtypes also impair the representativeness of the results. These methodological discrepancies make it difficult to perform a reliable cross-source analysis of tumour frequencies. This study aims to evaluate extensive cancer registry data to enable epidemiological comparisons across locations and to support differential diagnostic decisions by including age, gender, and line differentiation. METHODOLOGY: Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program (2000-2019, n = 12,809,525) and the German Centre for Cancer Registry Data (ZfKD; 2000-2019, n = 9,754,219) were merged. Tumours were classified according to ICD O 3.2. Incomplete and nonspecific datasets were removed and the remaining data visualised. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The processed datasets were made available both online and as offline downloads, enabling an aggregated overview based on grouped ICD-O‑3.2 codes as well as a differentiated analysis of morphological phenotypes across 73 anatomical sites. The resulting visualisations provide a uniform epidemiological basis for comparative tumour analyses across a broad spectrum of locations and entities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Die Pathologie
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-026-01566-7
Primary Topic
Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pathodashboard: an epidemiological atlas for tumour diagnostics

Wilfried Roth, Stephanie Strobl, B Straub, Patrick Focke et al.
Die Pathologie
Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
article

Pathodashboard: an epidemiological atlas for tumour diagnostics

Wilfried Roth, Stephanie Strobl, B Straub, Patrick Focke, Tiemo S. Gerber, Stefan Porubsky
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The availability of comparable epidemiological data on malignant tumours remains limited due to heterogeneous classification systems, divergent reference frameworks, and inconsistent case definitions. Incomplete data collection and an often biased focus on specific subtypes also impair the representativeness of the results. These methodological discrepancies make it difficult to perform a reliable cross-source analysis of tumour frequencies. This study aims to evaluate extensive cancer registry data to enable epidemiological comparisons across locations and to support differential diagnostic decisions by including age, gender, and line differentiation. METHODOLOGY: Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program (2000-2019, n = 12,809,525) and the German Centre for Cancer Registry Data (ZfKD; 2000-2019, n = 9,754,219) were merged. Tumours were classified according to ICD O 3.2. Incomplete and nonspecific datasets were removed and the remaining data visualised. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The processed datasets were made available both online and as offline downloads, enabling an aggregated overview based on grouped ICD-O‑3.2 codes as well as a differentiated analysis of morphological phenotypes across 73 anatomical sites. The resulting visualisations provide a uniform epidemiological basis for comparative tumour analyses across a broad spectrum of locations and entities.

Die Pathologie
University of Applied Sciences Worms (DE), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.