Harmonization of measurement units: mission impossible or ethical imperative?

Harmonization initiatives in laboratory medicine have a long history. Nevertheless, despite substantial efforts by international federations, scientific societies, and expert working groups, their implementation and widespread adoption remain incomplete, with many initiatives still at a relatively early stage of development. More recently, several initiatives have sought to identify scientifically sound yet pragmatic approaches to the harmonization of measurement units. To contribute to this debate, we invited experts from different disciplines of laboratory medicine, as well as a clinician, to provide their perspectives on the challenges, opportunities, and priorities for achieving greater harmonization. This Forum offers a unique opportunity to assess the current state of the art across multiple areas of laboratory medicine, including clinical chemistry, immunoassays, hematology, coagulation, molecular diagnostics, and serology. The contributions presented herein aim not only to highlight discipline-specific challenges but also to identify common principles and practical strategies that may guide future harmonization efforts. Although this paper does not propose a definitive roadmap for the harmonization of measurement units, its ultimate goal is to stimulate informed discussion and present a comprehensive spectrum of perspectives to international federations, national societies, regulatory authorities, and scientific journals. By doing so, it aims to support the identification of the most effective strategies for achieving greater consistency, comparability, and harmonization of laboratory reporting units worldwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2026-0934
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Harmonization of measurement units: mission impossible or ethical imperative?

P Simioni, Mario Plebani, Marc Thelen, Lora Dukić et al.
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
article

Harmonization of measurement units: mission impossible or ethical imperative?

P Simioni, Mario Plebani, Marc Thelen, Lora Dukić, Young Bae Lee Hansen, Emmanuel J. Favaloro, Étienne Cavalier, Wayne Dimech, Eloise J. Busby, Jim Huggett, Martina Zaninotto, Barbara De La Salle, Ruben L. Smeets
article en

Abstract

Harmonization initiatives in laboratory medicine have a long history. Nevertheless, despite substantial efforts by international federations, scientific societies, and expert working groups, their implementation and widespread adoption remain incomplete, with many initiatives still at a relatively early stage of development. More recently, several initiatives have sought to identify scientifically sound yet pragmatic approaches to the harmonization of measurement units. To contribute to this debate, we invited experts from different disciplines of laboratory medicine, as well as a clinician, to provide their perspectives on the challenges, opportunities, and priorities for achieving greater harmonization. This Forum offers a unique opportunity to assess the current state of the art across multiple areas of laboratory medicine, including clinical chemistry, immunoassays, hematology, coagulation, molecular diagnostics, and serology. The contributions presented herein aim not only to highlight discipline-specific challenges but also to identify common principles and practical strategies that may guide future harmonization efforts. Although this paper does not propose a definitive roadmap for the harmonization of measurement units, its ultimate goal is to stimulate informed discussion and present a comprehensive spectrum of perspectives to international federations, national societies, regulatory authorities, and scientific journals. By doing so, it aims to support the identification of the most effective strategies for achieving greater consistency, comparability, and harmonization of laboratory reporting units worldwide.

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
New South Wales Department of Health (AU), University of Padua (IT), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), University of Rijeka (HR), University of Liège (BE), Guildford College (GB), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Zealand University Hospital (DK), Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory (AU), Physical Measurement Laboratory (US), Center for Assessment (US), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège (BE), Westmead Institute for Medical Research (AU)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.