Clinical Impact of De Novo Donor-Specific HLA Antibodies on Early Kidney Allograft Outcomes: A Prospective Single-Center Cohort Study

Background: De novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) are associated with impaired allograft outcomes and the development of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection. However, their clinical impact during the early post-transplant period remains incompletely characterized. Methods: In this prospective single-center cohort study, we analyzed 218 kidney transplant recipients between 2006 and 2013 All patients underwent serial screening for the development of de novo donor-specific antibodies at different time points (1, 3, 6, 12 months) after kidney transplantation using contemporaneously available ELISA- or Luminex-based solid-phase assays. The data were correlated with clinical parameters and histopathological results from indication biopsies and analyzed in relation to clinical outcomes and histopathological findings. All data were analyzed to assess the impact on 1-year kidney function, patient and graft survival. Results: One year after renal transplantation, 7% of patients (n = 37) developed de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA). Among dnDSA-positive patients, 22% developed class I dnDSA, 67% class II dnDSA, and 11% both. In univariate analysis, markers of increased immunologic risk—such as previous transplantation, greater HLA mismatch, and reductions in immunosuppressive therapy—were associated with an increased risk of de novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) development. However, in multivariate analysis, only a panel-reactive antibody (PRA) level greater than 20% emerged as an independent predictor of dnDSA formation. Patients who developed dnDSA experienced a significant decline in graft function, with an approximately fourfold increased risk of overall graft failure within the first year. DnDSA-positive patients showed significantly reduced graft survival and impaired renal function at one year. Rejection rates were significantly higher in this group, with 48.6% experiencing histologically confirmed rejection, compared to 13.3% among dnDSA-negative patients. Conclusions: Monitoring for de novo DSA after kidney transplantation helps to identify patients at high risk for rejection, declining graft function, and poorer long-term outcomes. Routine post-transplant dnDSA monitoring may support early risk stratification and individualized clinical management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transplantology
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/transplantology7030016
Primary Topic
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Impact of De Novo Donor-Specific HLA Antibodies on Early Kidney Allograft Outcomes: A Prospective Single-Center Cohort Study

Lena Anthuber, M. Schrempf, Sebastian Wolf, Teresa Kauke et al.
Transplantology
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
article

Clinical Impact of De Novo Donor-Specific HLA Antibodies on Early Kidney Allograft Outcomes: A Prospective Single-Center Cohort Study

Lena Anthuber, M. Schrempf, Sebastian Wolf, Teresa Kauke, Michael Hoffmann, Florian Sommer, David Pinto, Dominik Gschwendtner
article en

Abstract

Background: De novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) are associated with impaired allograft outcomes and the development of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection. However, their clinical impact during the early post-transplant period remains incompletely characterized. Methods: In this prospective single-center cohort study, we analyzed 218 kidney transplant recipients between 2006 and 2013 All patients underwent serial screening for the development of de novo donor-specific antibodies at different time points (1, 3, 6, 12 months) after kidney transplantation using contemporaneously available ELISA- or Luminex-based solid-phase assays. The data were correlated with clinical parameters and histopathological results from indication biopsies and analyzed in relation to clinical outcomes and histopathological findings. All data were analyzed to assess the impact on 1-year kidney function, patient and graft survival. Results: One year after renal transplantation, 7% of patients (n = 37) developed de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA). Among dnDSA-positive patients, 22% developed class I dnDSA, 67% class II dnDSA, and 11% both. In univariate analysis, markers of increased immunologic risk—such as previous transplantation, greater HLA mismatch, and reductions in immunosuppressive therapy—were associated with an increased risk of de novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) development. However, in multivariate analysis, only a panel-reactive antibody (PRA) level greater than 20% emerged as an independent predictor of dnDSA formation. Patients who developed dnDSA experienced a significant decline in graft function, with an approximately fourfold increased risk of overall graft failure within the first year. DnDSA-positive patients showed significantly reduced graft survival and impaired renal function at one year. Rejection rates were significantly higher in this group, with 48.6% experiencing histologically confirmed rejection, compared to 13.3% among dnDSA-negative patients. Conclusions: Monitoring for de novo DSA after kidney transplantation helps to identify patients at high risk for rejection, declining graft function, and poorer long-term outcomes. Routine post-transplant dnDSA monitoring may support early risk stratification and individualized clinical management.

TransplantologyVol. 7(3)
University Hospital Augsburg (DE), Immungenetics (Germany) (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.